Teams

Baisch-BTS-26 Summer

2026 ADULT 18 & OVER SUMMER · 3.5 Women S26

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-20vs Johnson/SebringSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSara Canilang / Karen Dewing vs Diana Smigielski / Kelly Muhl5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJodie Korinek vs KJ Madison4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMeng Zhang / Grace Frazier vs Ellen Spika / Joyce Rosenbery6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Jorgensen / Michelle Joncas vs Ellen Anderson / Michelle Hintz7-6, 6-1
2026-07-13vs Johnson/SebringLost 23
W#1 DoublesKaren Dewing / Sara Canilang vs Lisa Proepper / Kavitha Bharath7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMolly Lyons vs Michelle Nauertz2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMeng Zhang / Grace Frazier vs Bryana Klofstad / Ellen Spika4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJodie Korinek vs Taylor Rondo3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesColleen Ryan / Karen Baisch vs Ellen Anderson / Kate Segler6-2, 6-2
2026-07-06vs Landrus 18+ S26Won 32
L#1 DoublesMeng Zhang / Sara Canilang vs Keela Cottew / Katie Hiller4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMolly Lyons vs Madeline Vargo7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesColleen Ryan / Jennifer Jorgensen vs Doyle O'Brien / Lynn Hu3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJodie Korinek vs Patricia Ashby6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Baisch / Michelle Joncas vs Lorna Mah Lee / Nancy Grubbs6-2, 6-1
2026-06-29vs PERfect In Pink S26Lost 04
L#1 DoublesJennifer Jorgensen / Meng Zhang vs Michelle Faucher / Sarah Tuel2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Joncas vs Jessica Kohl3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Dewing / Bridget Hegman vs Rachel Lund / Lindsay Ruppert3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Baisch / Alicia Reilly vs Jennifer Flanigan / Delaney Flanigan0-6, 3-6
2026-06-22vs Miller ECC - 3.5 18+Lost 04
L#1 DoublesMichelle Joncas / Grace Frazier vs Cynthia Baune / Podaly Jay3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBridget Hegman / Jennifer Jorgensen vs Laura Olson / Jill Gordon3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKaren Dewing vs Amy Weber5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAlicia Reilly / Beth Snyder vs Megan Brinkman / Biz McShane0-6, 3-6
2026-06-15vs Ehle/Henke 18+ Summer 2026Lost 13
L#1 DoublesMichelle Joncas / Colleen Ryan vs Renee Marek / Kara McGuire4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSara Canilang vs Angel Chandler2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Jorgensen / Bridget Hegman vs Lea Bloch / Michelle Couture2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Baisch / Beth Snyder vs Susan Bohlke / Mary Henke1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-08vs Stromberg/HaynesLost 23
L#1 DoublesMichelle Joncas / Colleen Ryan vs Anna Havelka / Gina Collins2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSara Canilang vs Tram Struve3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlicia Reilly / Beth Snyder vs Su Ann DeGeorgeo / Kimberly Reed7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMolly Lyons vs Catherine Hosamane6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBridget Hegman / Jennifer Jorgensen vs Meredith Stromberg / Amy Haynes3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-01vs Farrington: Tennis GirlsWon 32
W#1 DoublesGrace Frazier / Colleen Ryan vs Cheri Jacoby / Ruth Devey7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSara Canilang vs Kayla Nelson6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlicia Reilly / Beth Snyder vs Layne Kortbein / Hannah Bossert4-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesMolly Lyons vs Katie Wright6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKaren Baisch / Meng Zhang vs Claudia Chapman / Wendy Liu0-6, 6-7
2026-05-11vs Landrus 18+ S26Split 22
L#1 DoublesMichelle Joncas / Meng Zhang vs Keela Cottew / Katie Hiller6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGrace Frazier / Beth Snyder vs Christine Wellner / Jane Newman6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMolly Lyons vs Patricia Ashby6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJodie Korinek / Jennifer Jorgensen vs Lynn Hu / Heather Landrus4-6, 6-7
2026-05-04vs PERfect In Pink S26Lost 04
L#1 DoublesMichelle Joncas / Grace Frazier vs Lindsay Ruppert / Michelle Faucher1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMolly Lyons / Karen Dewing vs Michele Zens / Lauren Sporleder1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesSara Canilang vs Sarah Murphy5-7, 1-5
L#3 DoublesKaren Baisch / Meng Zhang vs Kim Wolson / Kristin Kroeger3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 3.5 Women S26
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kuhlmann/Miller The Volley Llamas10043722312
2PERfect In Pink S2610043724330
3Miller ECC - 3.5 18+82331741403
4Ehle/Henke 18+ Summer 202673311944402
5Hultman/Jopke Summer202673282248413
6Johnson/Sebring64302045404
7Soberg: 3.5 Slice Squad55262457455
8Weinberg Netizens Summer 202655212964490
9Warren/Borthwick Get a Grip46232761466
10Stromberg/Haynes46212962464
11NORGAARD Summer Slammers37242662468
12Overdahl/Dymit S2637183272498
13Curfman/Wernet - Summer 3.537173372473
14Landrus 18+ S2637163473514
15Baisch-BTS-26 Summer28153573502
16Farrington: Tennis Girls010113981548

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Bridget Hegman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Grace Frazier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Molly Lyons
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.20
Sara Canilang
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
3.19
Michelle Joncas
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Jodie Korinek
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Karen Dewing
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.93
Beth Snyder
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.92
Jennifer Jorgensen
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.83
Alicia Reilly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Beth Hustad
published 3
2.59
Karen Baisch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Wendy Melz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Jorgensen + Michelle Joncas314 matchesnot enough data
Alicia Reilly + Beth Snyder033 matchesnot enough data
Bridget Hegman + Jennifer Jorgensen123 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Jorgensen + Jodie Korinek033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bridget Hegman
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Grace Frazier
11W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Molly Lyons
9W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Sara Canilang
19W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Michelle Joncas
9W–15L career · 8 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Jodie Korinek
8W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02
Karen Dewing
5W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Beth Snyder
2W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Jennifer Jorgensen
25W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
2.92
3
Alicia Reilly
14W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Beth Hustad
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Baisch
8W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
Wendy Melz
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.