Teams

CSRC NIEMANN

2021 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - SOCO · MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-31Won 20
W#2 DoublesRyan Carlson / Sara Breese vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Bisanti / Rebecca Bisanti vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-15vs CCOC PARKERLost 02
L#1 DoublesMatthew Jones / Sara Breese vs Lauren Fong / Pat Pottger2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichael White / Kady Hommel vs Peter Holnback / Roni Schlagel3-6, 5-7
2021-05-02vs LTFCS STEPHENSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSara Breese / Ryan Carlson vs Jae Kim / WENDY WESTON6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKady Hommel / Michael White vs Jason Egger / Alexia Hignett1-6, 3-6
2021-04-25vs CCOC PARKERLost 02
L#1 DoublesRyan Carlson / Sara Breese vs Lauren Fong / Pat Pottger4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Bisanti / Rebecca Bisanti vs Nancy Siegel / Peter Holnback6-7, 3-6
2021-04-18vs MEMPK SWENSONWon 20
W#1 DoublesDaniel Bisanti / Kady Hommel vs Mark Lehrer / Candace McCollett6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSara Breese / Michael White vs Susan Lozanov / Tim Campbell6-4, 6-2
2021-04-10vs CSRC ONEILSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSara Breese / Matthew Jones vs Stephanie Brock / Frank Coyle6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Bisanti / Daniel Bisanti vs Vikki ONeil / Russell Walters5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Kady Hommel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Sara Breese
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Daniel Bisanti
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
James McPherson
published 4
3.24
Lori McPherson
published
Rebecca Bisanti
published
Ryan Carlson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori McPherson + James McPherson033 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Bisanti + Kady Hommel303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kady Hommel
102W–88L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Sara Breese
96W–84L career · 6 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Daniel Bisanti
69W–39L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
<1%50%50%
3.50
4
James McPherson
5W–25L career · type S · no lines in 2021
95%5%<1%
3.29
Lori McPherson
25W–38L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
Rebecca Bisanti
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Ryan Carlson
4W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.