Teams

Women's Sets in the City

Sets In the City - September 2021 · Women's Sets in the City

6 players · average NTRP 3.12 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Women's Sets in the City
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Women's Sets in the City000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Hannah Thomazin
published 3.5
3.16
Caitlin Tibbs
published 3.5
2.67
Jamie M Greer
published 3
2.30
AnnMarie Morrison
published 2.5
Holly Springston
published
Shelby Austin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hannah Thomazin
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Caitlin Tibbs
44W–34L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3
Jamie M Greer
10W–21L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
2.5
AnnMarie Morrison
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
0%94%6%
2.30
Holly Springston
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shelby Austin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.