Teams

CVTA/John Rogers

2026 CVTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall '25 · Men 4.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-20vs DawsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesSevero Avila / Cody Carr vs Tony Mejia / Juan Selle1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesPradeep Raja vs Dave Dawson6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Rogers / Michael Tucker vs Matthew Smith / Casey Reemsnyder6-4, 6-2
2025-10-13vs DawsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPradeep Raja / Michael Tucker vs Dave Dawson / Matthew Smith5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSevero Avila / Mark Lignell vs John David Cunningham / Tony Mejia2-6, 4-6
2025-10-06vs DawsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesPradeep Raja / Cody Carr vs Matthew Smith / Jacob Summerville7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Tucker / Severo Avila vs Lee Carter / Jeremy Best6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-29vs DawsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesJohn Rogers / Cody Carr vs Dave Dawson / Jeremy Best3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPradeep Raja vs Barclay Barnes6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKamron Palacios / Severo Avila vs Jacob Summerville / Tony Mejia6-4, 6-4
2025-09-23vs DawsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesPradeep Raja / Mark Lignell vs Casey Reemsnyder / Tony Mejia6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSevero Avila vs Jacob Summerville3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Tucker / Cody Carr vs Dave Dawson / Juan Selle3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Pradeep Raja
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
4.04
Severo Avila
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.98
Cody Carr
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.87
Mark Lignell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.78
Michael Tucker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kamron Palacios
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mathew Zellner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Severo Avila + Michael Tucker224 matchesnot enough data
Cody Carr + Severo Avila123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pradeep Raja
19W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
4.12
Severo Avila
29W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.04
4.5
Cody Carr
12W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.98
Mark Lignell
15W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.87
Michael Tucker
10W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
Kamron Palacios
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mathew Zellner
5W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.