Teams

DMeares/GGeorge

2022 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-12vs NHC-HuffmanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Noland / John-Michael O'Neill vs Dane Huffman / Rik Lovett6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMike Pearce / Derek Meares vs Larry Gregory Williams / John Perry3-6, 2-6
2022-10-05vs AOLIVER_BCCC_40Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Noland / John-Michael O'Neill vs Daniel Knox / Jeff Keisner5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMike Kaelin / Mike Pearce vs Matthew Smith / David Steele3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMike Behrens / Derek Meares vs Gabe Jimenez / Randeep Grewal0-6, 4-6
2022-09-28vs PNarula 40+ 7.5 ComboLost 02
L#2 DoublesMike Behrens / Mike Kaelin vs Amrit Narula / Paul Narula6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCharlie Foster / Derek Meares vs John VanDeWater / Pierre Rebeyrat0-6, 2-6
2022-09-21vs 7OaksWingo40+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMike Behrens / Mike Kaelin vs Dragan Jagnjic / Kevin Manweiler7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesMike Kaelin / Brad Killian vs Francis Sun / David Clark7-6, 6-4
2022-09-07vs NHC-HuffmanSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMike Pearce / John-Michael O'Neill vs Larry Gregory Williams / John Perry4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGreg George / Mike Kaelin vs Rik Lovett / Dane Huffman7-5, 6-3
2022-08-31vs AOLIVER_BCCC_40Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn-Michael O'Neill / Mike Pearce vs Brian Soltz / Brent Lamm4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGreg George / Derek Meares vs Matthew Smith / Ben Desonglo6-7, 2-6
2022-08-24vs PNarula 40+ 7.5 ComboWon 10
W#3 DoublesMike Kaelin / John-Michael O'Neill vs Mark Combs / Derek Philbeck6-2, 6-1
2022-08-17vs 7OaksWingo40+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDerek Meares / Mike Kaelin vs Matt Shait / Gavin Mazurak2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Roy Kelly
published
3.47
Brad Killian
published 3.5
3.44
Mike Kaelin
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.36
John-Michael O'Neill
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.34
Matt Mikula
published
3.06
Derek Meares
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Kaelin + Derek Meares1839% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roy Kelly
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Brad Killian
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Mike Kaelin
104W–73L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
John-Michael O'Neill
29W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Matt Mikula
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Derek Meares
68W–148L career · 5 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.