Teams

GSTL18/Whiteside/Stables

2025 Combo 18 & Over-GSTL · Adult Women - 7.5

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alice Whiteside
published 4
Alison Hayes
published 4
3.73
Nikola Faust
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Camilla Parker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Melissa Griese
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Elle Jones
published
3.29
Kylie Vaughn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Elizabeth Foxworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Doreen Cribb
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.16
Tara Crammer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Polly McCray
published
3.03
Linda Lane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Meredith Monroe
published
2.82
Kelly Cox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julee Reslewic
published
Kerri Evans
published
Stella Mercado
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Monroe + Elle Jones6649% games+7.8% vs expected
Doreen Cribb + Elizabeth Foxworth4157% games+6.3% vs expected
Tara Crammer + Stella Mercado8261% games+6.3% vs expected
Doreen Cribb + Camilla Parker3250% games−7.7% vs expected
Camilla Parker + Nikola Faust4170% gamesnot enough data
Doreen Cribb + Melissa Griese134 matchesnot enough data
Doreen Cribb + Meredith Monroe123 matchesnot enough data
Doreen Cribb + Kylie Vaughn213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alice Whiteside
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Alison Hayes
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nikola Faust
20W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.73
4
Camilla Parker
32W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Melissa Griese
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Elle Jones
21W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.31
Kylie Vaughn
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
Elizabeth Foxworth
45W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
Doreen Cribb
32W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Tara Crammer
31W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
Polly McCray
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Linda Lane
23W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Meredith Monroe
24W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Kelly Cox
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.82
Julee Reslewic
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kerri Evans
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Elizabeth Klein
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stella Mercado
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.