Teams

5 Avalon Bates

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesBrian Hellenga / Steven Edlavitch vs Ben Langley / Dan Gushman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNicholas Grainger vs Creighton Anders7-6, 6-4
2022-05-29vs 15 ACAC Kasten-CoxWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Sentz / Steven Edlavitch vs Dave Booth / Tim Kasten7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-22vs 13 Hermitage BetzSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSteven Edlavitch vs Brian Betz4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesNicholas Grainger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-15vs 11 Ridgetop AllinWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Giacchi / Nicholas Grainger vs Louis Allin / Christopher Carlin6-2, 6-1
2022-05-09vs 9 Raintree AndrewsLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Hellenga / Nicholas Grainger vs Mark Fallin / Wayne Tyler7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-05-01vs 7 Dominion SpillareSplit 11
L#1 SinglesNicholas Grainger vs Varun Mehta5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesSteven Edlavitch vs Richard Cifaldi7-6, 4-0
2022-04-24vs 1 Westwood Ringberg / WestWon 20
W#1 DoublesSteven Edlavitch / Frank Moore vs Jason Anderson / Richard White4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNicholas Grainger vs Cabell Doyle6-2, 6-2
2022-04-16vs 3 RCC ArmstrongWon 20
W#1 DoublesSteven Edlavitch / Brian Hellenga vs Andrew Wisniewski / Patrick Riendeau6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChris Giacchi / Nicholas Grainger vs Ron Armstrong / John LaFratta6-0, 6-0
2022-04-10vs 22 WOCC FranksWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteven Edlavitch / Chris Haberlin vs Raymond Cargill / Charles Christianson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Nicholas Grainger
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.57
Chris Giacchi
published 3.5
3.49
Steven Edlavitch
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.02
Kristopher Johnson
published
2.76
Ford Sleeman
published 3
2.72
Brian Hellenga
published 3
2.66
John Sentz
published
2.65
John Bates
published
2.62
Chris Haberlin
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Edlavitch + Nicholas Grainger10165% games+9.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nicholas Grainger
109W–50L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
3.62
3.5
Chris Giacchi
18W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Steven Edlavitch
122W–71L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
Kristopher Johnson
17W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Ford Sleeman
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Brian Hellenga
10W–19L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
John Sentz
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
John Bates
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
2.65
3
Chris Haberlin
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.