Teams

Hayslip/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women - Monday AM

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-04-09vs Hopson/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesShanoa Eastland / Laura Cates vs Ashley Watson / Marcy Burridge3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesChesley Summar vs Barbara Zwerner6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAnnie Pollard / Michelle Brunson vs Helen Hopson / Anna Stiller2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMelissa Hayslip vs Blaire Jett1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWhitney Jackson / Margaret Sheena de Giorgio vs Hannah Wright / Lindsey Smith5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Shanoa Eastland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Chesley Summar
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Melissa Hayslip
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.75
Shauna Bowers
published
2.73
Mary Oxford
published
2.67
Amy Woosley
published 3
2.66
Annie Pollard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Whitney Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Margaret Sheena de Giorgio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
2.37
Julia Pomeroy
published
2.30
Carrie Pfeiffer
published 2.5
Laura Cates
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Brunson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shanoa Eastland + Melissa Hayslip9555% games+5.5% vs expected
Mary Oxford + Shauna Bowers1538% gamesnot enough data
Mary Oxford + Annie Pollard213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Woosley + Margaret Sheena de Giorgio213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Woosley + Melissa Hayslip213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Woosley + Annie Pollard123 matchesnot enough data
Shanoa Eastland + Shauna Bowers213 matchesnot enough data
Whitney Jackson + Margaret Sheena de Giorgio123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shanoa Eastland
28W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
3.5
Chesley Summar
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
Melissa Hayslip
17W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Shauna Bowers
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
Mary Oxford
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Amy Woosley
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Annie Pollard
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Whitney Jackson
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Margaret Sheena de Giorgio
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
20%79%<1%
2.62
Katherine de Araujo Jorge
3W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%61%39%
2.46
Julia Pomeroy
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.37
2.5
Carrie Pfeiffer
0W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.30
Laura Cates
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Brunson
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.