Teams

GSTL55/Horton/Wachesaw

2025 Combo 55 & Over- GSTL · Adult WOMEN - 7.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-23vs GSTL55/Stokes/DunesWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatricia Horton / Doreen Cribb vs Dipti Paudel / Reaves Langdale4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWhitney Hewitt / Alice Puckett vs Sonya Martin / Shai Kahn6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Baxter / Julie Coggeshall vs Myla Butler / Wendy McCauley6-3, 6-0
2025-08-19vs GSTL55/Stokes/DunesWon 21
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Baxter / Mary Elizabeth Klein vs Dipti Paudel / Lisa Wallen6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCynthia Moran / Whitney Hewitt vs Becky Walls / Katie Sandoz4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Horton / Doreen Cribb vs Beth Warstler / Mary Singleton6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult WOMEN - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Alice Puckett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Cynthia Moran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Julie Coggeshall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Whitney Hewitt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Doreen Cribb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Patricia Horton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Genie Matthews
published
Mary Elizabeth Klein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Genie Matthews + Whitney Hewitt5258% games+15.6% vs expected
Doreen Cribb + Alice Puckett5160% games+8.2% vs expected
Whitney Hewitt + Cynthia Moran3353% games+8.0% vs expected
Genie Matthews + Patricia Horton2344% games−4.2% vs expected
Doreen Cribb + Patricia Horton224 matchesnot enough data
Genie Matthews + Julie Coggeshall224 matchesnot enough data
Julie Coggeshall + Cynthia Moran123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alice Puckett
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Cynthia Moran
12W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
Julie Coggeshall
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.36
Whitney Hewitt
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
Doreen Cribb
32W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Patricia Horton
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.02
Genie Matthews
12W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.93
Mary Elizabeth Klein
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.