Teams

TInga (Life Time)

2024 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-04vs ESuppa (PCC)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesTania Inga vs Carla Ackels3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesXia Xia vs Melissa O'Brien6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJasmine Fontaine vs Laura Richards3-6, 1-6
2024-07-29vs KDay (OPRC)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesJJ Zhu vs Stacey Valitchka4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesTania Inga vs Kristen Day4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesJasmine Fontaine vs Angie Mehrizi6-2, 6-2
2024-06-26vs KCurley (Raintree)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesTania Inga vs Susan Chandler4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesXia Xia vs Kelly Wolff6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesLinda Jo Mastrangelo vs Melissa Moloney0-6, 0-6
2024-06-22vs KCronin (Piper Glen)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesJJ Zhu vs Katie Cronin0-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesTania Inga vs Joanne Joliet2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJasmine Fontaine vs Katie Bissett3-6, 3-6
2024-06-19vs ESuppa (PCC)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesLinda Jo Mastrangelo vs Melissa O'Brien2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJasmine Fontaine vs Larissa Soto3-6, 4-6
2024-06-19vs BBaker (Queens)Split 11
L#1 SinglesTania Inga vs Brittany Baker1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesKate Lauren vs Holly Meloy7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-12vs PSweeney (Firethorne CC)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesKate Lauren vs Jennifer Voci1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesXia Xia vs Wendy Hall5-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesTania Inga vs Patty Sweeney5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-29vs KDay (OPRC)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesXia Xia vs Stacey Valitchka2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJJ Zhu vs Angie Mehrizi1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesTania Inga vs Elizabeth Conway6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Kate Lauren
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.76
Jasmine Fontaine
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.72
Tania Inga
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 3
2.67
Xia Xia
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.56
Linda Jo Mastrangelo
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.40
JJ Zhu
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jasmine Fontaine + Tania Inga121747% games−0.1% vs expected
Kate Lauren + Xia Xia4255% gamesnot enough data
Linda Jo Mastrangelo + Tania Inga2343% gamesnot enough data
Tania Inga + Xia Xia2343% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kate Lauren
41W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Jasmine Fontaine
50W–76L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Tania Inga
46W–63L career · 7 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
2.5
Xia Xia
44W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%12%88%
2.67
2.5
Linda Jo Mastrangelo
23W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%34%66%
2.56
3
JJ Zhu
28W–67L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.