Teams

Enk/40s/3.5/PAC

2026 Man · Cov Mixed 40 & Over

18 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Michael Lane
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.32
Douglas Dillon
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.27
Amber Mata
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.20
Daniel Enk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.17
Ann Boushie
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
3.10
Crissy Green
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
3.06
Danielle Roussel
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
Jason Catt
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Jason Landry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lowell Shih
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published
Mary Toce
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published
Paul Guidotti
published
Rebecca Sandoz
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Regina Knight
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Ross Doyle
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Scott Cuevas
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Shannon Enk
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Wayne Songy
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Enk + Daniel Enk5449% gamesnot enough data
Ann Boushie + Jason Catt7066% gamesnot enough data
Scott Cuevas + Jason Catt4161% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Enk + Scott Cuevas134 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Sandoz + Scott Cuevas303 matchesnot enough data
Regina Knight + Jason Catt123 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Enk + Mary Toce213 matchesnot enough data
Ross Doyle + Michael Lane303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Lane
35W–8L career · 24 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Douglas Dillon
9W–13L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Amber Mata
22W–29L career · 28 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Daniel Enk
19W–18L career · 16 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Ann Boushie
52W–22L career · 35 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.17
3
Crissy Green
30W–11L career · 26 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.10
3.5
Danielle Roussel
16W–11L career · 16 lines in 2026
32%67%<1%
3.06
Jason Catt
38W–17L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jason Landry
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lowell Shih
12W–5L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Toce
41W–26L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paul Guidotti
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rebecca Sandoz
37W–21L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Regina Knight
21W–23L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ross Doyle
18W–7L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Scott Cuevas
28W–20L career · 26 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shannon Enk
52W–32L career · 37 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wayne Songy
12W–22L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.