Teams

CALIFORNIA TC 40AM4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-16vs BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 40AM4.0CLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Kushner / Howard Park vs Carlos del Rio / Andrew Ho2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDavid Gendreau vs Bobby Carter6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndrew Sparks / Michael Terris vs Sean Moore / Nicholas Lynch0-6, 2-6
2025-03-16vs GOLDEN GATE TC/GOLDMAN TC 40AM4.0ALost 13
L#1 DoublesMark Kushner / Gregory Spivy vs Vincent Mar / Ed Korenman7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDouglas Bria vs Vikram Viswanathan0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Gendreau / Charlie Wyman vs Carl Oman / Ilya Rozenfeld1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTrevor Wright / Scott Barrett vs Walter Martin / Johannes Kratz6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Michael McDonough
published
3.82
Michael Breyer
published
3.78
Mark Kushner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Gregory Spivy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
David Gendreau
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Richard Treadwell
published
3.70
Carl Kawaja
published 4
3.70
Joe Elson
published
3.67
Duncan Kennedy
published
3.66
Trevor Wright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
William Matthes
published
3.53
Andrew Sparks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Charlie Wyman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Michael Terris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Douglas Bria
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Howard Park
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Spivy + Trevor Wright213 matchesnot enough data
Michael McDonough + Trevor Wright123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael McDonough
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Michael Breyer
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Mark Kushner
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Gregory Spivy
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
David Gendreau
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Treadwell
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Carl Kawaja
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Joe Elson
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Duncan Kennedy
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Trevor Wright
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
William Matthes
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Andrew Sparks
2W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
4
Charlie Wyman
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Michael Terris
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
Douglas Bria
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Howard Park
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.