Teams

KC-RH BLUE

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-30vs KC-RH YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJami Jensen / Sandy Courtney vs Lauren Plain / Janet Weyhmiller3-6
W#2 DoublesJoelle Arne / Sara VanHook vs Briana Epp / Christie Weber6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-23vs SS-HP PURPLESplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoelle Arne / Rachel Schneider vs Jan Bennett / Jessica Sutton6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKit Fitzgerald / Susan Bratschun vs Valerie Norris / Patty Weston1-6, 0-6
2024-05-16vs SS-LGT BLACKWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoelle Arne / Sara VanHook vs Janet Swanson / Susie Taylor6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSandy Courtney / Jami Jensen vs Roberta Seifert / Ellen Shoemaker6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-09vs HRCA-N ORANGELost 02
L#2 DoublesJoelle Arne / Sara VanHook vs Ruby Fast / Tara Simmons5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Seemann / Susan Khanna vs Terry Fiala / Heather Coker5-7, 5-7
2024-05-06vs PH NAVYLost 02
L#2 DoublesSharon Seemann / Susan Khanna vs Rebecca Grace / Colleen Powell5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSandy Courtney vs Margaret Lawson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-05-02vs LTFC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara VanHook / Joelle Arne vs Debra Stamatis / Stephanie Stavri6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandy Courtney / Kit Fitzgerald vs Theresa Gilpatrick / Shelley Chism6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSharon Seemann / Dawn Robbins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-30vs LEBTC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Logsdon / Sara VanHook vs Laurien Hottman / Marlyse Aguirre3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Seemann / Susan Khanna vs Tanya Koch / Rhea McMahon4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKit Fitzgerald / Jami Jensen vs Sarah Nelson / Cynthia Clifford5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ashley Yuan
published 4
3.68
Karen Logsdon
published
3.55
Laura Kane
published
3.44
Joelle Arne
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.21
Sharon Seemann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Sara VanHook
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Dawn Robbins
published 3.5
3.11
Sandy Courtney
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Jami Jensen
published
2.98
Susan Khanna
published
2.97
Susan Bratschun
published
2.83
Kit Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Courtney + Sharon Seemann3358% games+10.9% vs expected
Sara VanHook + Joelle Arne412455% games+4.8% vs expected
Sara VanHook + Sandy Courtney7258% games+4.7% vs expected
Sara VanHook + Jami Jensen3549% games+0.3% vs expected
Jami Jensen + Sandy Courtney2547% games−0.7% vs expected
Jami Jensen + Sharon Seemann2443% games−5.7% vs expected
Susan Khanna + Sharon Seemann1541% games−8.7% vs expected
Kit Fitzgerald + Sandy Courtney3643% games−11.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ashley Yuan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Logsdon
21W–28L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Laura Kane
15W–6L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Joelle Arne
64W–36L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Sharon Seemann
52W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Sara VanHook
74W–62L career · 5 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Dawn Robbins
8W–23L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Sandy Courtney
71W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
Jami Jensen
11W–27L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
Susan Khanna
4W–16L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
Susan Bratschun
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Kit Fitzgerald
28W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.