Teams

El.Wallace18C

2024 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-29vs Su.Albion18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesStuart Gupton / Kristin Baddour vs Holly Santago / Annie Flowers1-6, 2-6
2024-09-22vs Kr.Levine18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesSydnor Coffman / Mary Southgate Simms vs Laura Stanziale / Elizabeth Rupert7-5, 6-4
2024-09-15vs Na.Baddar18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesSydnor Coffman / Allison Gupton vs Kate Rigsbee / Amy DiGiuseppe6-4, 6-3
2024-09-08vs De.Farmer18C5.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesKristin Baddour / Stuart Gupton vs Michelle Mills / Lori Krzeszewski6-4, 6-3
2024-08-26vs Kr.Levine18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Schacht / Stuart Gupton vs Jennifer Kaulback / Christine Rosin4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-18vs Je.Sagal Solomon18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesStuart Gupton / Elizabeth Schacht vs Corinne Alavi / Marilyn Gordian2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-08-12vs Su.Albion18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesStuart Gupton / Sydnor Coffman vs Kristin Blankenhorn Tharpe / Ashley Grantham3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Allison Gupton
published 3
2.93
Katherine Kleisch
published
2.86
Sydnor Coffman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Stuart Gupton
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.72
2.45
Kristin Baddour
published
2.37
Ellie Gilmore
published 2.5
2.33
Sallie Glover
published
2.26
Ellen Shook
published 2.5
Katherine Franck
published
Rebecca Geiger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Schacht + Ellie Gilmore314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Gupton
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
Katherine Kleisch
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Sydnor Coffman
32W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Stuart Gupton
44W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Elizabeth Schacht
6W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.72
Kristin Baddour
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.45
2.5
Ellie Gilmore
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%83%17%
2.37
Sallie Glover
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
2.33
2.5
Ellen Shook
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.26
Katherine Franck
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Geiger
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.