Teams

SD 3.5 Mtn View/ Padilla

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE Women · SD- Women- WE 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-30vs SD LLW 3.5 SDTRC /KauffmanLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Rorstad / Aida Padilla vs Sandra Angel / Kim Schwab0-6, 2-6
2023-06-25vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC/ CHS / WestLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Rorstad / Marcela Dongo vs Meagan McKissick / Erin Enrico7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAida Padilla vs Frida Kalach0-6, 1-6
2023-06-18vs SD 3.5 Mtn View/ HernandezLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Rorstad / Aida Padilla vs Celia Hernandez / Maria Corbitt5-7, 1-6
2023-06-04Won 10
W#1 SinglesAida Padilla vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-07vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC/ LeshLost 01
L#1 DoublesAida Padilla / Valeria Moore vs Ana Chapman / Jennifer Neivert2-6, 0-6
2023-04-30vs SD 3.5 Peninsula TC/ BarnettLost 01
L#1 SinglesAmy Rorstad vs Patricia HOLMAN3-6, 0-6
2023-04-23vs SD 3.5 Balboa TC/ EdwardsLost 12
W#1 DoublesEsmeralda Pena / Brenda Villasenor vs Jacinthe Pare / Lisa Mallory5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmy Rorstad vs Jillian Rodriguez2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAida Padilla / Valeria Moore vs Caryn Rubanovich / Tori Penick1-6, 0-6
2023-04-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesAida Padilla vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women- WE 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Brenda Villasenor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Anna Raiff
published 4
3.15
FLOR A SANCHEZ
published 3.5
3.08
Endy Sevilla
published 3.5
2.96
2.80
Amy Rorstad
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Evelyn Irving
published 3
2.56
Aida Padilla
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brenda Villasenor
85W–49L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Anna Raiff
34W–25L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
3.5
FLOR A SANCHEZ
4W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Endy Sevilla
3W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Frances Simpson Lang
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Amy Rorstad
82W–150L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Evelyn Irving
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Aida Padilla
54W–135L career · 7 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.