Teams

PLEASANTON CM6.5B

2025 COMBO · Men 6.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-17vs FREMONT TC CM6.5CWon 30
W#1 DoublesTarun Khanna / Ronald Smith vs Hiren Patel / Saurabh Aggarwal6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSoheil Esmaeilzadeh / Gary Cain vs John Boral / Ankitesh Singh7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesArjun Kumar / Gurmeet Singh vs Harmail Singh / Siva Hari6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-21vs FREMONT TC CM6.5CWon 21
W#1 DoublesKith Parikh / abhishek mishra vs manoj thakkar / Rui Ni6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmit Wadhwa / Tarun Khanna vs Siva Hari / Ankitesh Singh6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesArjun Kumar / Nikhil Joshi vs John Boral / Vignesh Balaji6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
3.65
Gaurav Anand
published 3.5
3.30
3.29
abhishek mishra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Arjun Kumar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.15
Soheil Esmaeilzadeh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Kith Parikh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.11
Samuel Valeriano
published
3.11
Gary Cain
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Tarun Khanna
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Gurmeet Singh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Nikhil Joshi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samuel Valeriano + Arjun Kumar8068% games+9.0% vs expected
Gurmeet Singh + Samuel Valeriano303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Praveenkumar Davidson
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Gaurav Anand
27W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.65
Ravi Kiran Reddy Madireddy
24W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.64
Nathan Michael Mertz
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
abhishek mishra
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.29
3
Arjun Kumar
20W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.26
Soheil Esmaeilzadeh
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
3
Kith Parikh
12W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.14
Samuel Valeriano
18W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.11
3.5
Gary Cain
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Tarun Khanna
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Gurmeet Singh
13W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%44%
2.98
3
Nikhil Joshi
7W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.