CPV NAVY
2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER
11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule7 played
i
Flight standings57 teams · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1BTA-IBM NAVY | 7 | 0 | 10 | 158 |
| 2LTFC BLUE | 7 | 0 | 12 | 182 |
| 3LTFC RED | 7 | 0 | 18 | 198 |
| 4NJ RED | 7 | 0 | 20 | 203 |
| 5HRCA-N NAVY | 6 | 0 | 16 | 185 |
| 6CACM RED | 6 | 1 | 9 | 171 |
| 7MC RED | 6 | 1 | 15 | 178 |
| 8GAC BLUE | 6 | 1 | 16 | 162 |
| 9BVP NAVY | 6 | 1 | 17 | 182 |
| 10PRKR RED | 6 | 1 | 18 | 213 |
| 11BP GREEN | 6 | 1 | 24 | 217 |
| 12MEA NAVY | 6 | 1 | 29 | 243 |
| 13GTC RED | 5 | 2 | 23 | 207 |
| 14BRMST GREEN | 5 | 2 | 25 | 221 |
| 15CACM BLUE | 5 | 2 | 25 | 205 |
| 16KC-CC RED | 5 | 2 | 25 | 230 |
| 17MEA GREEN | 5 | 2 | 26 | 229 |
| 18BTA-IBM BLUE | 5 | 2 | 31 | 259 |
| 19PH RED | 4 | 2 | 21 | 181 |
| 20SS-LT GREEN | 4 | 2 | 24 | 222 |
| 21KC-CC BLUE | 4 | 2 | 30 | 216 |
| 22SKY RED | 4 | 3 | 20 | 187 |
| 23HW GREEN | 4 | 3 | 25 | 209 |
| 24CM GREEN | 4 | 3 | 29 | 227 |
| 25EM RED | 4 | 3 | 29 | 213 |
| 26PRC BLUE | 4 | 3 | 29 | 256 |
| 27MC GREEN | 4 | 3 | 35 | 272 |
| 28LEBTC GREEN | 3 | 3 | 25 | 192 |
| 29SKY BLUE | 3 | 4 | 29 | 251 |
| 30LTA-Q RED | 3 | 4 | 29 | 250 |
| 31RHCC BLUE | 3 | 4 | 31 | 280 |
| 32DTC GREEN | 3 | 4 | 33 | 245 |
| 33GPTC BLUE | 3 | 4 | 33 | 253 |
| 34DCHS SILVER | 3 | 4 | 38 | 266 |
| 35HFII GREEN | 3 | 4 | 39 | 265 |
| 36TTA RED | 3 | 4 | 42 | 292 |
| 37KC-RH YELLOW | 2 | 4 | 27 | 209 |
| 38SS-LGT NAVY | 2 | 4 | 30 | 229 |
| 39HRCA-S GREEN | 2 | 5 | 34 | 242 |
| 40NJ BLUE | 2 | 5 | 37 | 265 |
| 41CACM ORANGE | 2 | 5 | 37 | 265 |
| 42SS-H BLUE | 2 | 5 | 38 | 285 |
| 43KC-RH NAVY | 2 | 5 | 38 | 265 |
| 44WC RED | 2 | 5 | 39 | 279 |
| 45DTP RED | 2 | 5 | 40 | 259 |
| 46LTA-Q GREEN | 2 | 5 | 42 | 294 |
| 47CVTA BLUE | 2 | 5 | 43 | 300 |
| 48MVCC BLUE | 2 | 5 | 44 | 297 |
| 49KC-RH GREEN | 1 | 6 | 41 | 296 |
| 50TTA GREEN | 1 | 6 | 43 | 291 |
| 51SH RED | 1 | 6 | 45 | 290 |
| 52LEBTC RED | 0 | 6 | 43 | 274 |
| 53CPV NAVY | 0 | 6 | 43 | 270 |
| 54LTC-M RED | 0 | 7 | 46 | 309 |
| 55CVTA RED | 0 | 7 | 50 | 320 |
| 56SS-H GREEN | 0 | 7 | 54 | 330 |
| 57CP BLUE | 0 | 7 | 56 | 336 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Jonathan Landis + Azim Khan | 3–2 | 53% games | −1.3% vs expected |
| Brian McDonald + Michael Gersack | 3–4 | 52% games | −3.9% vs expected |
| Lance Bourque + Brian McDonald | 3–3 | 48% games | −6.0% vs expected |
| Jonathan Landis + Alex Mercer | 5–8 | 46% games | −14.9% vs expected |
| Jonathan Landis + Lance Bourque | 1–3 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Lance Bourque + Alex Mercer | 1–3 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Lance Bourque + Azim Khan | 1–3 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Lance Bourque + Michael Gersack | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.