Teams

Buckhorn Matchmakers - C. Sullivan

2025 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#3 DoublesAndrea Stuart / Jackie Lindemulder vs Erin Forehand / Jennifer O'malley2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRenee Rasmussen / Andrea Stuart vs Theresa Mays / Hannah Gabora6-7, 2-6
2025-02-28vs Hills/Marinez/18&Over3.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrea Stuart / Olivia Plourde vs Shanna Kim / Carrie Harrison2-6, 1-6
2025-02-10vs TYCC Yachty By Nature - L. DavittLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrea Stuart / Melissa Sparks vs Julianne Frost / Jessica Digiacomo4-6, 0-6
2025-02-03Lost 01
L#2 SinglesAndrea Stuart vs Melissa Foster1-6, 3-6
2025-01-27vs Arbor Greene - K. CoffeyWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrea Stuart / Renee Rasmussen vs Alessandra Giraldo / Carrie Lacy6-2, 6-1
2025-01-13vs Palma Ceia Ad Outs - E. KempWon 10
W#2 SinglesAndrea Stuart vs Lindsey Bradbury7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Erin Lobner
published
2.97
Andrea Stuart
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
2.93
2.91
Erin Posey
published
2.73
2.72
Emily Corbett
published
2.69
Melissa Sparks
published
2.66
Lisa Walden
published
2.64
Carlee Revoy
published 3
2.53
Renee Rasmussen
published
2.47
Jackie Lindemulder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Catherine Kotson
published 3
2.28
Olivia Plourde
published
S Joy Boisselle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Corbett + Renee Rasmussen3255% games+7.9% vs expected
Christina Sullivan + Andrea Stuart7453% games+6.1% vs expected
Renee Rasmussen + Jackie Lindemulder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Lobner
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Andrea Stuart
103W–100L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Christina Sullivan
19W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Erin Posey
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.91
Maria Karina Espinoza
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Emily Corbett
14W–20L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Melissa Sparks
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Lisa Walden
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Carlee Revoy
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Renee Rasmussen
11W–19L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.53
Jackie Lindemulder
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%58%42%
2.47
3
Catherine Kotson
11W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Olivia Plourde
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.28
S Joy Boisselle
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.