Teams

HRCA-N PURPLE

2023 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-29vs PRC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathleen Samuelli / Tammy Gould vs Linda Manassee Buell / Wendy Mathewson2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-04-22vs LEBTC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesGretchen Burr / Kathleen Samuelli vs Toni Chalmers / Christina Schwartz1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCarol Lugo vs Shari Newton3-6, 3-6
2023-04-15vs HW REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesClaudia Swanson / Kathleen Samuelli vs Randy Eidler / Stephanie Luther3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCami Schaefer / Carol Lugo vs Rhonda Patston / Corby McGrath7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2023-04-08vs LTFC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Lugo / Kathleen Samuelli vs Trish Casson / Lynn Pearson5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTammy Gould vs Sviatlana Yasianovich4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGretchen Burr / Michelle Davis vs Erin Wade / Robyn Moore2-6, 3-6
2023-04-01vs HFII BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesGretchen Burr / Claudia Swanson vs Jeana Marks / Ann Hugh6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTammy Gould / Carol Lugo vs Sally Panis / Lisa Watson7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Carol Lugo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Cami Schaefer
published 3.5
3.20
Gretchen Burr
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Claudia Swanson
published 3.5
3.13
Kathleen Samuelli
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Tammy Gould
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Swanson + Cami Schaefer4353% games−0.2% vs expected
Claudia Swanson + Gretchen Burr4452% games−0.3% vs expected
Kathleen Samuelli + Claudia Swanson4344% games−6.6% vs expected
Kathleen Samuelli + Gretchen Burr044 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Samuelli + Cami Schaefer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Lugo
127W–91L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Cami Schaefer
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Gretchen Burr
82W–90L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Claudia Swanson
22W–20L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Kathleen Samuelli
90W–97L career · 4 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Tammy Gould
68W–109L career · 3 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.