Teams

Fruge/55/4.0/MX/OCC

2026 LAF Mixed 55 & Over · 4.0 Laf (55&O) Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-04vs Searle/55/4.0/MX/OCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesBoyd Snellgrove / Allyson Morris vs David Larriviere / Sherry Wilson6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKelly Lee / Janice Searle vs Michael Blanchard / Ferri Fontenot7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJames Nelson / Ruth Larimer vs Dwayne Searle / Tanya Campbell4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-03vs Searle/55/4.0/MX/OCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Fontenot / Ruth Larimer vs Michael Blanchard / Ferri Fontenot6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBoyd Snellgrove / Eileen Fruge vs Dwayne Searle / Tanya Campbell7-6, 6-3
2026-07-30vs Searle/55/4.0/MX/OCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Fontenot / Janice Searle vs Dwayne Searle / Sherry Wilson6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTynes Mixon / Roxanne Breaux vs David Larriviere / Tanya Campbell7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Laf (55&O) Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Allyson Morris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
John Fontenot
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Eileen Fruge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Jason Quinlan
published
3.80
Tynes Mixon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Donna Briley
published
3.75
Ruth Larimer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Boyd Snellgrove
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
James Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Janice Searle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Roxanne Breaux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Edward Breaux Sr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eileen Fruge + Boyd Snellgrove224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allyson Morris
24W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%40%60%
4.04
John Fontenot
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
Eileen Fruge
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Jason Quinlan
17W–4L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Tynes Mixon
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Donna Briley
9W–14L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Ruth Larimer
21W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Boyd Snellgrove
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
James Nelson
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
Janice Searle
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
Roxanne Breaux
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.46
Edward Breaux Sr
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.