Teams

Worley/Bennett/LR/Reb

2026 Combo 40 & Over 6.5, 8.5 · 6.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 8 7:30 PM
Rebsamen Tennis Center
Sep 16 6:00 PM
Rebsamen Tennis Center
Sep 24 6:00 PM
Rebsamen Tennis Center
Oct 6 6:00 PM
Burns Park Tennis Center
2026-08-31vs ATA Team/BPWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Shepherd / Roger Weldon vs Randy Cain / Keith Skinner6-1, 3-0
L#2 DoublesBobby Perry / Pete Owens vs Chadley Uekman / Chris Holleman1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDean Worley / Scott Wolf vs Steven Ransdell / Robert Lee6-2, 6-1
2026-08-27vs Lair/LR/RebsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJason Bennett / Phil Rampey vs Greg Engstrom / David Pate4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDean Worley / Roger Weldon vs Clark Cogbill / Paul Hruby3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Shepherd / Mark McGetrick vs Jeff Hankins / Jess Griffin6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lair/LR/Rebs000000
2Massey/LR/Burns000000
3Worley/Bennett/LR/Reb000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Jason Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Roger Weldon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Bobby Perry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Mark McGetrick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Stan Belue
published
3.02
Phil Rampey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Dean Worley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Max Good
published
2.86
Pete Owens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bobby Perry + Mark McGetrick5159% games+1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Bennett
35W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.52
Roger Weldon
27W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Bobby Perry
21W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
Mark McGetrick
30W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Stan Belue
15W–17L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Phil Rampey
19W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Dean Worley
41W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Max Good
21W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Pete Owens
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.