Teams

WHRC-Ganji

2019 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Frank Foti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Bill Lowblad
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Larry Kaster
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Richard Press
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Sibyl Jarrett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Alison Davis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.96
Sheila Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Cathy Zagunis
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Alan Potts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Judy Potts
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-06-09Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBill Lowblad / Alison Davis vs Kim Hamlik / Jim Hamlik5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLarry Kaster / Angela Addington vs Lee Wilcox / Jacqueline Wilcox6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGuy Neal / Cathy Zagunis vs Trylla Lembke / Steven Darling6-3, 7-5
2019-06-02Won 30
W#1 DoublesBill Lowblad / Alison Davis vs Ingrid Reimers / Ron Reimers6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLarry Kaster / Angela Addington vs Jim George / Kathleen Francis7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesYoshi Isobe / Sibyl Jarrett vs Anton Broms / Janet Collier7-6, 6-0
2019-05-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJudy Potts / Larry Kaster vs Gail Obra / Steve Suttich7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2019-05-11Won 20
W#1 DoublesBill Lowblad / Alison Davis vs Ann-Marie Lundberg / Martin Wells6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesFrank Foti / Cathy Zagunis vs Kristi Tompkins / Rand Zoborowski6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2019-05-04Won 20
W#1 DoublesYoshi Isobe / Sibyl Jarrett vs Sharon Loomis-Malin / Tod Breslau6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFrederick Ganji / Sheila Schmidt vs Allan Warman / Cassie Warman6-1, 6-1
2019-04-28Won 21
L#1 DoublesFrank Foti / Cathy Zagunis vs Donna Kennish / James Lawrence7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLarry Kaster / Angela Addington vs Andrea Vicino / Frank Brown5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Press / Sibyl Jarrett vs Jackie Konen / Gerry Nuthmann0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-04-20Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJudy Potts / Alan Potts vs Weizhen Guo / Tony Moreno6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSheila Schmidt / Guy Neal vs Carla Wheeler / Craig Frasier6-3, 6-3
2019-04-14Won 21
L#1 DoublesLarry Kaster / Angela Addington vs Ken Dragoon / Sheryl Riley6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlan Potts / Judy Potts vs David Mealey / Donna Walker7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesGuy Neal / Alison Davis vs Charles Wickens / Lynn Wickens6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Frank Foti
20W–21L career
3%90%7%
3.32
3.5
Bill Lowblad
92W–61L career
1%97%2%
3.30
3.5
Larry Kaster
20W–21L career
not enough data
3.5
Richard Press
13W–23L career
not enough data
3.5
Sibyl Jarrett
36W–73L career
not enough data
3.5
Alison Davis
80W–62L career
27%73%1%
3.08
3.5
Sheila Schmidt
38W–69L career
44%56%0%
2.96
3.5
Cathy Zagunis
45W–66L career
55%45%0%
2.93
3
Alan Potts
13W–41L career
not enough data
3
Judy Potts
10W–36L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.