Teams

HCC Combo 5.5- Toups

2026 Combo Doubles 40&Over-PB · Women 5.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-03vs Collins 5.5 40Won 30
W#1 DoublesStacie Wallace / Ming Morris vs Susan Slaughter / Paula West7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Queck / Crystie Aultman vs Lennie Schilling / Lisa Stevens6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAshley Vance / Wilhelmina Jarvis vs Bettie Collins / Jessica Lott6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 5.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HCC Combo 5.5- Toups1030013
2LCC-Bynum-5.5 Combo-40+000000
3Collins 5.5 400103637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Nicole Toups
published
2.74
Ashley Vance
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Crystie Aultman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
Renee Koenenn
published
2.53
Stacie Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Ming Morris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Wilhelmina Jarvis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Cher Evans
published 3
2.37
Sarah Queck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Mary Kathryn Burge
published
2.22
Michelle Knight
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Toups + Ashley Vance4163% games+9.9% vs expected
Crystie Aultman + Stacie Wallace314 matchesnot enough data
Cher Evans + Renee Koenenn134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Toups
37W–25L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.93
3
Ashley Vance
48W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Crystie Aultman
22W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Renee Koenenn
24W–12L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Stacie Wallace
14W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Ming Morris
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%63%37%
2.45
Wilhelmina Jarvis
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
3
Cher Evans
21W–16L career · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.43
Sarah Queck
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
Mary Kathryn Burge
9W–32L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Michelle Knight
2W–13L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.