Teams

WH Beattie SSL A55-8.0W

2022 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 55&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A55&O 8.0 W (6 player)

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-16vs MVC Wassenaar SSL A55-8.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesMargaret Zahrai / Carol Oudsema vs Debbie Buchan / Sharon Barnes3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Konwinski / Jackie Buck vs Erin Fouty / Karen Bell6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDarla Wright / Terri Beattie vs Marie Shea / Rebecca Baines6-2, 6-3
2022-06-02vs HC Alexander SSL A55-8.0WSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTerri Beattie / Jackie Buck vs Erin Needham / Beth Post5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Oudsema / Margaret Zahrai vs Nancy Swaney / Judith Lubbers4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-26vs MY Lancaster SSL A55-8.0WWon 20
W#1 DoublesJenifer Zeno / Darla Wright vs Susan Trillet / Betty Trebing6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJackie Buck / Diane Konwinski vs Teresa Smith-Epstein / Denise Lancaster6-2, 6-3
2022-05-19vs MVR Kloet SSL A55-8.0WWon 20
W#1 DoublesTerri Beattie / Darla Wright vs Christine Stehlik / Pauline Unfried6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarol Oudsema / Margaret Zahrai vs Danuta Radzio / Nancy Joure6-3, 6-0
2022-05-16vs MVR Kloet SSL A55-8.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesDarla Wright / Patricia Wright vs Danuta Radzio / Pauline Unfried7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTerri Beattie / Jackie Buck vs Pam Rush / Christine Stehlik6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCarol Oudsema / Margaret Zahrai vs Gayl Kessel / Pam Kloet6-3, 6-3
2022-05-05vs MY Lancaster SSL A55-8.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesTerri Beattie / Jackie Buck vs Betty Trebing / Teresa Smith-Epstein7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarol Oudsema / Margaret Zahrai vs Denise Lancaster / Karen Hoffman2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Heinicke / Ann Wright vs Glorianna Fogarty / Nancy McCune6-2, 6-2
2022-04-28vs MVC Wassenaar SSL A55-8.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesJackie Buck / Terri Beattie vs Debbie Buchan / Sharon Barnes7-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Konwinski / Margaret Zahrai vs Michele Ferenchick / Katherine Gregg1-6, 3-6
2022-04-21vs PA Sanchez-Martin SSL A55-8.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesJackie Buck / Terri Beattie vs Kris Ponstine / Mary Muller0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Oudsema / Margaret Zahrai vs Dianne McCormick / Kristin Hofman6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarol Heinicke / Ann Wright vs Christina Sanchez-Martin / Karen Reid7-5, 6-1
2022-03-24vs HC Alexander SSL A55-8.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesJackie Buck / Diane Konwinski vs Tanya Gonzalez / Linda Schnobel0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Zahrai / Carol Oudsema vs Erin Needham / Beth Post3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTerri Beattie / Ann Wright vs Ann Dawson / Kathy Kroeze4-6, 1-6
2022-03-03vs PA Sanchez-Martin SSL A55-8.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesJackie Buck / Diane Konwinski vs Julie Kienast / Joan Hannadarrell3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTerri Beattie / Carol Heinicke vs Mary Muller / Karen Reid6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI SSL A55&O 8.0 W (6 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Darla Wright
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Jackie Buck
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.59
Carol Heinicke
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Diane Konwinski
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Terri Beattie
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Margaret Zahrai
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Carol Oudsema
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Jenifer Zeno
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jackie Buck + Terri Beattie231355% games+3.1% vs expected
Jackie Buck + Diane Konwinski4359% games−3.2% vs expected
Terri Beattie + Carol Heinicke3642% games−3.5% vs expected
Margaret Zahrai + Terri Beattie3448% games−6.5% vs expected
Carol Oudsema + Margaret Zahrai9356% gamesnot enough data
Carol Oudsema + Carol Heinicke9258% gamesnot enough data
Jackie Buck + Carol Heinicke1443% gamesnot enough data
Darla Wright + Terri Beattie314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darla Wright
18W–8L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jackie Buck
111W–60L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Carol Heinicke
117W–155L career · 3 lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Diane Konwinski
43W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
Terri Beattie
116W–126L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Margaret Zahrai
83W–98L career · 8 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Carol Oudsema
24W–17L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jenifer Zeno
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.