Teams

Southerland 65+

2024 Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over · Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-07vs SchneiderLost 01
L#3 DoublesHoward Staley / Lothar Kranefeld vs Steve Newcomer / Thomas Schneider1-6, 1-6
2024-07-09vs SchneiderLost 01
L#3 DoublesDaniel Mandl / Richard Anderson vs Steve Newcomer / James Murduck2-6, 1-6
2024-06-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLothar Kranefeld / Howard Staley vs Bennett Sweren / Michael Kane3-6, 0-6
2024-06-17vs SchneiderLost 01
L#3 DoublesAl Zanger / Richard Anderson vs William Bloomquist / Samuel Hughes0-6, 0-6
2024-05-28vs SchneiderSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRichard Anderson / Al Zanger vs Clayt Lemme / William Bloomquist3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHoward Staley / Lothar Kranefeld vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-14vs Mid-Atlantic/Theis/65&Over8.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Burnell / Richard Anderson vs Joseph Touzin / Cliff Bernstein2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Al Zanger
published 4
3.69
David Burnell
published 4
3.52
Al Baker
published 4
3.24
Howard Staley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Daniel Mandl
published 3.5
3.22
Richard Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Greg Kahlert
published
Jay Anania
published
Jordan Schlick
published
Mark Southerland
published
Randall Scott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Anderson + Howard Staley8753% gamesnot enough data
Al Baker + Jay Anania033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Al Zanger
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
David Burnell
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.69
4
Al Baker
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Howard Staley
22W–43L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Daniel Mandl
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Richard Anderson
40W–62L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Greg Kahlert
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jay Anania
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jordan Schlick
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Southerland
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Randall Scott
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.