Teams

SKY RED

2024 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesKerry Hutcheson / Jeff Hutcheson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesKerry Hutcheson / Jeff Hutcheson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-16vs SKY BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesKerry Hutcheson / Jeff Hutcheson vs Catherine Hodges / Bentley Hodges2-6, 3-6
2024-06-09vs CM YELLOWWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Hutcheson / Kerry Hutcheson vs Alison Thompson / Joseph Mullen6-1, 6-2
2024-06-02vs CP GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesKerry Hutcheson / Jeff Hutcheson vs Lena Ursten Hobbs / Michael Kraft4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-26vs GTC TEALWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Hutcheson / Kerry Hutcheson vs Paul Santanello / Joelle Klein6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Jeff Hutcheson
published
3.26
Kerry Hutcheson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
3.00
Jon Kalstein
published
2.89
Ginger Merry
published
2.88
Dan Galemba
published 3
2.83
Jennifer Rigsby
published
Brannan Schell
published 3
2.75
Sharlene Keithley
published
2.71
Livingston Keithley
published
1.82
Kate Kalstein
published
Rebecca Galemba
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Hutcheson + Jeff Hutcheson11662% games+15.5% vs expected
Sharlene Keithley + Livingston Keithley51045% games−3.3% vs expected
Rebecca Galemba + Dan Galemba1746% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Hutcheson
21W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3
Kerry Hutcheson
58W–12L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.26
Jon Kalstein
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
Ginger Merry
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Dan Galemba
11W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
Jennifer Rigsby
22W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Brannan Schell
0W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharlene Keithley
21W–29L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.75
Livingston Keithley
13W–21L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Kate Kalstein
0W–22L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Rebecca Galemba
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.