Teams

Team 1 FDP

2025 NOVA Mixed 40 & Over · NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 6.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-12vs Team 5 EtheridgeWon 20
W#1 DoublesXinyu Wei / Michael Chen vs Benjamin Utech / Alicia O'Brien6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCaixia Che / Rick Liang vs Chandler Fox / Dianne Payne6-1, 6-2
2025-06-08vs Team 5 EtheridgeWon 20
W#1 DoublesRick Liang / Lihang Ren vs Robin Dunning / Chandler Fox6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJun Chang / Caixia Che vs Ted Berner / Ruth Hughes6-1, 6-1
2025-06-03vs Team 7 Grand Slam BreakfastWon 10
W#1 DoublesJun Chang / Xinyu Wei vs Robert Youree / Barbara Hancock6-2, 6-2
2025-05-18vs Team 4 Causing a Racquet 6.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesRick Liang / Lihang Ren vs Jennifer Kroll / Chad Runfola6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCaixia Che / Jun Chang vs Steve Riccardi / Joi Ruther6-1, 6-0
2025-05-16vs Team 7 Grand Slam BreakfastWon 20
W#1 DoublesCaixia Che / Michael Chen vs James Moore / Linda Thierauf6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRick Liang / Xinyu Wei vs Donald Meyer / Johanna Maney6-0, 6-2
2025-05-10vs Team 2 Racquet ScienceWon 20
W#1 DoublesJun Chang / Xinyu Wei vs Jennifer Park / Clay Pak6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRick Liang / Sammy Himmelsteib vs Iakovos Babalitis / Jessica Turgon6-2, 6-1
2025-04-17vs Team 3 CrenshawWon 20
W#1 DoublesJun Chang / Xinyu Wei vs Christopher Damboise / Lisa Ohlweiler6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRick Liang / Mei Xue vs Bryan Daguiar / Kelly King6-2, 5-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Caixia Che
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Sheldon Fu
published
3.16
Rick Liang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.11
Lihang Ren
published
3.03
Xinyu Wei
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.91
Kai Yu
published
2.84
Lei Wang
published
2.81
Sammy Himmelsteib
published
Jun Chang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lei Wang + Sheldon Fu5164% gamesnot enough data
Caixia Che + Rick Liang303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caixia Che
87W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Sheldon Fu
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Rick Liang
137W–59L career · 9 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16
Lihang Ren
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.11
3
Xinyu Wei
62W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
Kai Yu
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.91
Lei Wang
15W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.84
Sammy Himmelsteib
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Jun Chang
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.