Teams

Veltri/Wank

2024 Broward Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 *Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-22vs Broward/Rivas/18&Over7.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesPaulette Janice Snagg / Veronica Wank vs Upasna Jha / Maria Lanza6-7, 2-6
2024-08-31vs Broward/Rivas/18&Over7.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesSahar Moghaddam / Sara Kane vs Lissette Loddo / Lidia Luz6-3, 6-2
2024-08-21vs Broward/Cordova/18&Over7.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesSahar Moghaddam / Sara Kane vs Andrea Cepero / Andrea Tarud2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Williams / Theresa Caruso vs Garbine de la Mora / Jody Julmice2-6, 2-6
2024-08-15vs Piccolo/CisnerosSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSahar Moghaddam / Sara Kane vs Carolina Santos-Mayi / Lucy Bastidas7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVeronica Wank / Audrey Gayle vs Itala Ream / Dana Reece6-3, 6-1
2024-07-17vs Broward/Cordova/18&Over7.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesVeronica Wank / Maria Moreno vs Taciana Kalili / Jody Julmice2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSahar Moghaddam / Sara Kane vs Marta Pena / Amy Brown7-6, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 *Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Sahar Moghaddam
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Veronica Wank
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Audrey Gayle
published 4
3.65
Clarena Furtado
published 4
3.61
Maria Moreno
published
3.57
3.53
Stacy Solano
published
3.47
Tammy Gibson
published
3.31
Sara Kane
published
3.07
Theresa Caruso
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Caruso + Sahar Moghaddam1638% gamesnot enough data
Theresa Caruso + Veronica Wank123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sahar Moghaddam
280W–189L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Veronica Wank
149W–154L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Audrey Gayle
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Clarena Furtado
12W–15L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
Maria Moreno
4W–15L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.61
Paulette Janice Snagg
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
Stacy Solano
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
Tammy Gibson
30W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.47
Sara Kane
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.31
Theresa Caruso
98W–182L career · 1 line in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.