Teams

LSLE-Lerme-McKenna/CSD

2023 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Women 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-02vs LTUT-Utz/River RunLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Dove / Lori Kitchens vs Stephanie Nixdorf / Kelly Ryan3-6, 6-7
2023-09-25vs LSCL-Clancy/CRPLost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Dove / Teri Deuel vs Stephanie Clancy / Cindy Peterson4-6, 3-6
2023-09-11vs LMSM-Smith/EdgemoorLost 01
L#3 DoublesSherry Lerme / Mary Beth Thomas vs Stephanie Schaeper / Keri Norcross0-6, 1-6
2023-08-28vs LCBO-Bogojevich/CSDLost 02
L#1 DoublesDina White / Sherry Lerme vs Elizabeth Mangano / Teresa Pal2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Dove / Lori Kitchens vs Paige Mcguirk / Jacquie Wheeler2-6, 0-5
2023-08-21vs LDBE-Beam-Dudan/JettonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Beth Thomas / Beth Packard vs Karen Ray / Andrea McRorie4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Linda Dove
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Dina White
published 3.5
3.43
Tracey McKenna
published
3.40
Mary Beth Thomas
published
3.38
Trish Behnke
published
3.38
Samantha Warren
published
3.29
Sherry Lerme
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Sandy McAlpine
published
3.13
Lori Kitchens
published
3.04
Beth Packard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Teri Deuel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry Lerme + Beth Packard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Linda Dove
67W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
3.5
Dina White
20W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
Tracey McKenna
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.43
Mary Beth Thomas
0W–10L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
3.40
Trish Behnke
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
Samantha Warren
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Sherry Lerme
90W–106L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
Sandy McAlpine
2W–24L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.29
Lori Kitchens
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Beth Packard
77W–149L career · 3 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Teri Deuel
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.