Teams

Alboniga - RS Hard

2025 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 2.5 Mixed 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-14vs Hagen - PCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesTrent Harmon / Heather Harmon vs Matthew Myer / Elizabeth Dudney3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBud Lawrence / Carson Turner vs Marty Stanovich / Honey Harris5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChris Kelly / Carrie Stevenson vs Evan Legassey / Krysanne Hagen6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-07-25vs Hagen - PCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesBud Lawrence / Carson Turner vs Elizabeth Dudney / Matthew Myer4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTrent Harmon / Heather Harmon vs Madyson Stacker / Marty Stanovich6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAnna Boardman / Nick Bussell vs Evan Legassey / Krysanne Hagen2-6, 1-6
2025-07-24vs Couch - PCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesTrent Harmon / Heather Harmon vs David Schenkel / Madeleine Leidner6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBud Lawrence / Carson Turner vs Austin Swatzyna / Alex Messmore6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChris Kelly / Carrie Stevenson vs Seth Thompson / Marissa Couch2-6, 3-6
2025-07-10vs Jasionowski - RS HardWon 21
L#1 DoublesChris Kelly / Carrie Stevenson vs Travis Swann / Chelsey Swann5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBud Lawrence / Carson Turner vs Percy Rojas / Alicia Brizuela6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTrent Harmon / Heather Harmon vs Christopher Ross / Katherine Ross6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.53
Trent Harmon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.39
Carrie Stevenson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Anna Boardman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.22
Brian Trivison
published 2.5
2.14
Bud Lawrence
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.02
Carson Turner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
JC Alboniga
published
Nick Bussell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carson Turner + Bud Lawrence2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trent Harmon
7W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%42%58%
2.53
2.5
Carrie Stevenson
3W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
0%78%22%
2.39
2.5
Anna Boardman
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Brian Trivison
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Bud Lawrence
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
2.5
Carson Turner
8W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
JC Alboniga
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Bussell
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.