Teams

AIannuzzi/MSevigny (Carmel)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-08vs TMiller/DMaguire (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Harrison / Maria Sevigny vs Dina Maguire / Diane Turner Bearss6-3, 6-3
2023-04-19vs ASchmitt (Olde Providence)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMaria Sevigny / Beth Hahn vs Anne Krug / Lauren Packman6-0, 6-0
2023-04-16vs HGriffith/AReynolds (CSRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMaria Sevigny / Courtney Reichs Mixon vs Rachael Dunnavant / Charlotte Haydon6-3, 6-4
2023-03-31vs MCollins/KHoracek (Lifetime)Won 10
W#3 DoublesSara Porrata / Maria Sevigny vs Seung Hee Noh / Angie Wagner6-3, 6-3
2023-03-22vs TThomas/KGriffin (Sardis)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSUSAN ALIOTA / Sara Porrata vs Annaliese Anderson / Tracy Thomas6-3, 6-2
2023-03-17vs KShute/ATrexler (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSara Porrata / SUSAN ALIOTA vs Katie Shute / Allie Trexler6-1, 6-0
2023-03-08vs LShelton (BCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMaria Sevigny / Beth Hahn vs Linda Shelton / Margit Etzel6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Beth Hahn
published 3.5
3.34
Maria Sevigny
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Amy Iannuzzi
published 3.5
3.25
Sara Porrata
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.22
Sandy Dellinger
published
3.15
3.02
Michele Simpson
published
2.82
SUSAN ALIOTA
published
2.49
Lauren Burke
published
Erin Conklin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Porrata + Maria Sevigny404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Hahn
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.39
3.5
Maria Sevigny
105W–47L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Amy Iannuzzi
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Sara Porrata
65W–40L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Sandy Dellinger
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Courtney Reichs Mixon
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Michele Simpson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
3.02
SUSAN ALIOTA
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Carrie Carickhoff
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lauren Burke
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.49
Erin Conklin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.