Teams

Nguyen

2025 South East Tennis Combo 40 & OVER · Men 8.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-24vs LOZITO 40+ 8.5 ComboLost 12
L#1 DoublesEddie Hardgrove / William Leath vs Brendan Bastable / Andrew Collins7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Richards / Han-Leong Goh vs Edwin Wagenseller / Dereck Boone6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBarry Dempsey / James Seidel vs Patrick Eagan / Jason Weddle3-6, 2-6
2025-08-21vs Barefoot 8.5 ComboLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Mabie / Bradley Ransome vs Zachary Tran / Bryan Williams2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Edwards / Paul Richards vs Matt Zayko / Matthew Hilliard2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEddie Hardgrove / Sam Cox vs Ben Hawkins / Justin Pugh6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Christian Sanchez
published 4.5
4.13
Eddie Hardgrove
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.12
Bradley Ransome
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.93
Paul Richards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Barry Dempsey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.81
James Seidel
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
William Leath
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
John Hirchak
published
3.58
Han-Leong Goh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.26
Sam Cox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kenneth Myers
published
William Mabie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christian Sanchez
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Eddie Hardgrove
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
4.5
Bradley Ransome
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.12
Paul Richards
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.93
4.5
Barry Dempsey
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.92
4
James Seidel
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
William Leath
14W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
John Hirchak
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Han-Leong Goh
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Sam Cox
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.26
Kenneth Myers
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Mabie
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.