Teams

6-Rlongjr-Eno

2022 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-04vs 5-TMiller-CHCCLost 01
L#1 SinglesTom Luben vs Tom Porter7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-20vs 4-MBLAND-CHTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesLee Goldberg / Reggie Oakley vs Randy Grigg / Franck Seguin5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesTom Luben vs John Hess3-6, 4-6
2022-04-13vs 1-JMontague CCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Quattlebaum / Tom Luben vs Robert Long / Travis Angle3-6, 2-6
2022-04-07Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Quattlebaum / Reggie Oakley vs Alexander Lynch / Andy MacKelfresh3-6, 4-6
2022-04-06vs 3-KBuckel-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesReggie Oakley / Richard Poole vs Matt Carter / Kellen Kane0-6, 4-6
2022-03-30vs 5-TMiller-CHCCSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRichard Poole / Reggie Oakley vs David Zvara / Tom Porter2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRyan Soles / Tom Luben vs Aaron Meadows / Steve Travers7-5, 6-2
2022-03-28vs 1-JMontague CCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesReggie Oakley / John Groth vs Travis Angle / Stephen Arrowood4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTom Luben vs JAMES MONTAGUE3-6, 0-6
2022-03-21vs 4-MBLAND-CHTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesReggie Oakley / Richard Poole vs Charles Fisher / Jay Bauer7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRyan Soles / Tom Luben vs Derek Phillips / Randy Grigg2-6, 5-7
2022-03-02vs 3-KBuckel-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesTom Luben / Lee Goldberg vs Marc Rosenthal / Leon Grodski Barrera3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Tom Luben
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
2.82
Mary T Long
published
2.66
Reggie Oakley
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
Lee Goldberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reggie Oakley + Tom Luben3347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Tom Luben
87W–115L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.86
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Reggie Oakley
56W–103L career · 6 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.66
Lee Goldberg
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.