Teams

WIKIUP R SC 18AM4.0A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-10vs GALVIN PK 18AM4.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrian Johnson / Geoff Scott vs Chad Thistle / Mauricio Rodriguezramirez6-3, 6-2
2023-06-03vs FOUNTAINGROVE-AC 18AM4.0AWon 10
W#2 SinglesBrian Johnson vs Jady Palko7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrian Johnson / Geoff Scott vs Shane Grevin / Scott Wester1-6, 6-7
2023-05-13vs LA CANTERA RC 18AM4.0AWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrian Johnson / Geoff Scott vs Chris Casey / Mark Latimer6-0, 6-1
2023-05-06vs LA CANTERA RC 18AM4.0AWon 10
W#2 SinglesBrian Johnson vs Michael Nolden6-1, 6-2
2023-04-27vs FOUNTAINGROVE-AC 18AM4.0AWon 10
W#2 SinglesBrian Johnson vs Vivek Kumra6-0, 6-0
2023-04-23vs GALVIN PK 18AM4.0ALost 01
L#2 SinglesBrian Johnson vs Philip Stepanek6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesArcadio Fogal / Brian Johnson vs Robildo Diaz / Geoffrey Kegley4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Jamin Ruark
published
3.97
Brian Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 27%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 4
3.96
Roy Peterka
published
3.90
Chris Trechter
published 4
3.83
Weldon Ryckman
published
3.83
Nathan Strong
published
3.69
Philippe Hobson
published
3.64
Jon Moens
published
Douglas Oclassen
published
Razi Arifuddin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roy Peterka + Nathan Strong11065% games+10.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jamin Ruark
22W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
4.05
4
Brian Johnson
77W–55L career · 13 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.97
Roy Peterka
13W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Chris Trechter
11W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
Weldon Ryckman
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
Nathan Strong
15W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
Philippe Hobson
27W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%9%91%
3.69
Jon Moens
11W–2L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
Douglas Oclassen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Razi Arifuddin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.