Teams

Montana/Miller 55&OverMX

2025 55 & Over Mixed · 8.0 55 & Over Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-09vs VraalagWon 21
W#1 DoublesJamie Armstrong / Kimimi Ashley vs Ann Jackson / Dennis Vap6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBruce Hazeltine / Sue Clark vs Paige Darden / Dana Miller7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBritt Olander / Sarah Miller vs Cyndy Desin / Jimmy Vroman7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-11-09vs VraalagLost 12
L#1 DoublesBruce Hazeltine / Sue Clark vs Paige Darden / James Shaffer3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKimimi Ashley / Jamie Armstrong vs Ann Jackson / Peter Teal6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGatchina Hessler / Andrew Lenssen vs Ann Waters / Thomas Shea5-7, 1-6
2025-11-08vs VraalagLost 12
W#1 DoublesJamie Armstrong / Kimimi Ashley vs Ann Jackson / Peter Teal6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBruce Hazeltine / Sue Clark vs Paige Darden / James Shaffer2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGatchina Hessler / Andrew Lenssen vs Ann Waters / Thomas Shea0-6, 1-6
2025-11-08vs VraalagWon 21
L#1 DoublesBritt Olander / Sarah Miller vs Cyndy Desin / Jimmy Vroman3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKimimi Ashley / Jamie Armstrong vs Ann Jackson / Dennis Vap6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSue Clark / Bruce Hazeltine vs Paige Darden / Dana Miller2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 55 & Over Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Andrew Lenssen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Gatchina Hessler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jamie Armstrong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Kimimi Ashley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Sue Clark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Bruce Hazeltine
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Britt Olander
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimimi Ashley + Jamie Armstrong404 matchesnot enough data
Sue Clark + Bruce Hazeltine224 matchesnot enough data
Sue Clark + Jamie Armstrong044 matchesnot enough data
Gatchina Hessler + Andrew Lenssen044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Lenssen
15W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Gatchina Hessler
41W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Jamie Armstrong
6W–6L career · type M · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Kimimi Ashley
24W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
Sue Clark
17W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Bruce Hazeltine
20W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Britt Olander
1W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.