Teams

GMurrell/Guinn (Charlotte Indoor)

2022 Adult 65 & Over League · 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Mon AM

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-11vs JSanderson/SPignetti (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKate Blankenship / Joan Slep vs Karen Broyhill / Freida Schipman6-7, 3-6
2022-03-28vs KTodd (Weddington)Won 20
W#2 DoublesMaureen Genser / Gillian Murrell vs Kathi Todd / Pat Simpson7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJoan Slep / Roxanne Lamm vs Celia Stallings / Elizabeth Hollidge6-4, 6-2
2022-03-21vs CHobson (Weddington)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKate Blankenship / Gillian Murrell vs Jane Neese / Nanette Murphy7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoan Slep / Maureen Genser vs Sandy Johnson / Beverly Russo7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-14vs CThilo (Pine Lake)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGillian Murrell / Sally Wrenn vs Rene Griffin / Julie Selz2-6, 1-6
2022-03-07vs PKahle (Charlotte Indoor)Split 11
L#1 DoublesGillian Murrell / Kate Blankenship vs Julie Benton / Linda Hindel4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJoan Slep / Sally Wrenn vs Katherine Hargett / Dianne Petrosino6-4, 6-4
2022-02-21vs JSanderson/SPignetti (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKrista Sandy / Joan Slep vs Tina Hough / Janice Abluton7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2022-02-14vs SStover (Southampton)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKate Blankenship / Gillian Murrell vs W Kay Bridges / Cindy Wilson3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Mon AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Kate Blankenship
published
3.01
Joan Slep
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.94
Gillian Murrell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.64
Kathryn Shomo
published
2.62
Maureen Genser
published
2.46
Kay Dugan
published
2.34
Carol Guinn
published 3
Krista Sandy
published
Roxanne Lamm
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Blankenship + Gillian Murrell2545% games−7.5% vs expected
Gillian Murrell + Joan Slep8550% games−7.8% vs expected
Kay Dugan + Carol Guinn044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Blankenship
5W–19L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
Joan Slep
50W–55L career · 5 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Gillian Murrell
49W–55L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
Kathryn Shomo
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
Maureen Genser
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
Kay Dugan
2W–13L career · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.46
3
Carol Guinn
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
2.34
Krista Sandy
11W–39L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Roxanne Lamm
25W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.