Teams

CGilley-CHCC

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Men Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-07vs BKing-DURWon 20
W#1 SinglesSammy Myers vs Harrison Bailey6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesM Scott Alexander vs Greg Sabin6-3, 6-1
2026-06-30vs RMcGarrah-HRLost 02
L#1 SinglesSammy Myers vs Mark Fossum1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesLucas Beal vs Brian Reo0-6, 3-6
2026-06-16vs SBurger-DURLost 02
L#2 SinglesLucas Beal vs Andrew Thorne3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesM Scott Alexander vs Stanislav Kukhniy3-6, 5-7
2026-06-09vs CYang-DURLost 03
L#1 SinglesSammy Myers vs Yinhao Ren2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesScott Davies vs Hengning Cao4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesM Scott Alexander vs Chang Yang1-6, 1-6
2026-06-02vs GHigh-DURLost 12
L#1 SinglesScott Davies vs James Lambert6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCarlos Quintero vs Ryan Phillips6-3, 6-4
L#3 SinglesLucas Beal vs Will Clark6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-26vs CLynch-DURLost 12
L#1 SinglesSammy Myers vs Conor Lynch0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCasey Gilley vs Matthew Feldt2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesCorey Hansen vs FJ Magee7-5, 6-2
2026-05-19vs RSamulski-CHTCWon 21
L#1 SinglesScott Davies vs Richard Samulski2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesSammy Myers vs Charles McMillan6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesM Scott Alexander vs Tommy Rose6-4, 6-1
2026-05-05vs JByrd-DURLost 03
L#1 SinglesCarlos Quintero vs Blake Jensen2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesCorey Hansen vs Andrew Hedgpeth5-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesLucas Beal vs Stacy Bowden0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Sammy Myers
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.77
Carlos Quintero
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.71
M Scott Alexander
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.71
Casey Gilley
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.69
Corey Hansen
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.69
Scott Davies
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.54
Lucas Beal
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sammy Myers
15W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Carlos Quintero
3W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
M Scott Alexander
2W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Casey Gilley
1W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Corey Hansen
2W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
2.69
Scott Davies
10W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
2.69
Lucas Beal
3W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.