Teams

CCTA60/BLACK/SUNCITY

Fall League 60 & Over - Beaufort Co. · Women's 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Susan Pina
published
2.94
Jane Olthuis
published
2.77
Cynthia Nye
published 3
Bette Lynch
published 3
Debi Black
published 3
Ellen Crouse
published 3
2.75
Ada Blount
published 3
2.71
Ellen Hart
published 3
2.69
June Burns
published
Jean Harris
published
Kay Lowell
published
Mary Jo Chaiken
published
Paula Morse
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Pina + Ada Blount3252% games−0.4% vs expected
June Burns + Ellen Hart134 matchesnot enough data
June Burns + Cynthia Nye044 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Hart + Jean Harris224 matchesnot enough data
Debby McMurray-Giuliano + Jane Olthuis314 matchesnot enough data
June Burns + Susan Pina123 matchesnot enough data
Paula Morse + Ada Blount033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Pina
44W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
Jane Olthuis
20W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Debby McMurray-Giuliano
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Cynthia Nye
22W–28L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Bette Lynch
3W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Debi Black
4W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Ellen Crouse
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Ada Blount
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Ellen Hart
9W–22L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
June Burns
12W–22L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Jean Harris
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kay Lowell
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Jo Chaiken
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paula Morse
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.