Teams

CRabidou (Carmel)

2026 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-25vs LEvansek (Blakeney)Won 10
W#1 SinglesGeorge Sistrunk vs Manojkumar Panachikal Madhavan6-4, 6-0
2026-07-06vs MThompson (Windyrush)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesSteven DiVittorio vs Burns McGarry3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAndrew Halverstam vs Ian Klass6-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesChristopher Rabidou vs Victor Ellison3-6, 6-7
2026-06-29vs MFiddes (Raintree)Split 11
L#1 SinglesMark Krasniewski vs Mark Fiddes6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesChristopher Rabidou vs Michael Fresina6-1, 6-4
2026-06-22vs KFranks (PPRSC)Won 21
L#1 SinglesChristopher Rabidou vs Alven Weil4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesCarl Jacobs vs Kent Franks5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesSteven DiVittorio vs Chris McIver6-1, 6-0
2026-06-15vs EOBrien (WSRC)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesGeorge Sistrunk vs Jaiganesh Rajamanickam5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSteven DiVittorio vs Vladislav Valtsis1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-06-08vs DBarden (Mountainbrook)Won 30
W#1 SinglesMark Krasniewski vs Tai Kam1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesChristopher Rabidou vs Robert Barden6-4, 7-5
W#3 SinglesSteven DiVittorio vs Daniel Malecki6-1, 6-0
2026-06-07vs HMahgoub/DMichael (PCC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesChristopher Rabidou vs David Michael5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMark Krasniewski vs Alexander Killeffer5-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Carl Jacobs
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Steven DiVittorio
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.38
Mark Krasniewski
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Andrew Halverstam
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Christopher Rabidou
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
George Sistrunk
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Krasniewski + Carl Jacobs123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carl Jacobs
72W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Steven DiVittorio
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Mark Krasniewski
23W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Andrew Halverstam
3W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Christopher Rabidou
8W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
George Sistrunk
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.