Teams

Team 1 FOREVER YOUNG at Night

2024 NOVA Adult 55 & Over · NOVA Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.46 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-20vs Team 2 Net ForceWon 20
W#2 DoublesMary Krueger / Sharon Sabasteanski vs Debbie Kem / Joan Donoghue6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDonna Lee / Elizabeth Marcotte vs Beth Hill / Kim Monk6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-08-17vs Team 3 Golden GirlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesPamela Nix / Paige Fishel vs Elizabeth Pyszka / Tina Woods6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeri Borsi / Donna Lee vs Kathryn Welsh / Lauren Hayden6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSharon Sabasteanski / Amy Frix vs Jeannie Ng / Constance Seid6-2, 6-5
2024-08-10vs Team 2 Net ForceLost 02
L#2 DoublesJeri Borsi / Joan-Marie Turchiano vs Joan Donoghue / Debbie Kem6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Diner / Sibyll Jones vs Terry Lederer / Lauren Rowley1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-08-06vs Team 3 Golden GirlsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJeri Borsi / Donna Lee vs Elizabeth Pyszka / Mary Crespy7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPamela Nix / Joan-Marie Turchiano vs Susan Spector / Ursula Cox2-6, 3-6
2024-07-31vs Team 2 Net ForceSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJill Adler / Jenelle Langen vs Elise Sander / Jennifer Yoon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDina Bessa / Sibyll Jones vs Lynn Koggan / Kim Monk3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-07-21vs Team 2 Net ForceWon 10
W#3 DoublesSibyll Jones / Dina Bessa vs Elise Sander / Alison Bouwmeester6-1, 6-3
2024-07-17vs Team 3 Golden GirlsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJoan-Marie Turchiano / Elizabeth Marcotte vs Shawn Dalton / Tina Woods7-6, 3-2
L#3 DoublesJenelle Langen / Jill Adler vs Jeannie Ng / Victoria Roberts3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Jenelle Langen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Paige Fishel
published
3.38
Sharon Sabasteanski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Jeri Borsi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Christine Hopkins
published 3.5
3.27
Sibyll Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Pamela Nix
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Amy Cahoon
published 3.5
3.23
Joan-Marie Turchiano
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Mary Krueger
published
3.17
Elizabeth Marcotte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Diane Diner
published 3.5
3.11
Boni Vinter
published 3.5
3.09
Mary Aaron
published
3.08
Amy Frix
published 3.5
2.91
Dina Bessa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Jill Adler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sibyll Jones + Jeri Borsi6063% games+8.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Marcotte + Mary Krueger3257% games+3.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Marcotte + Jeri Borsi111050% games+2.2% vs expected
Sibyll Jones + Joan-Marie Turchiano11557% games−0.9% vs expected
Joan-Marie Turchiano + Jeri Borsi11755% games−2.5% vs expected
Dina Bessa + Jill Adler133744% games−7.7% vs expected
Joan-Marie Turchiano + Elizabeth Marcotte7650% gamesnot enough data
Jill Adler + Jenelle Langen8258% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jenelle Langen
243W–115L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Paige Fishel
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Sharon Sabasteanski
255W–176L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Jeri Borsi
123W–102L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Christine Hopkins
10W–21L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Sibyll Jones
149W–177L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Pamela Nix
193W–201L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amy Cahoon
179W–281L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Joan-Marie Turchiano
153W–162L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Mary Krueger
17W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Elizabeth Marcotte
166W–175L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Diane Diner
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Boni Vinter
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Mary Aaron
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Amy Frix
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Dina Bessa
102W–139L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
2.91
3
Jill Adler
108W–136L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.