Teams

VCC RED

2025 CTA WOMEN'S 2.5 - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-09vs SS-LT GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesKadie Desoe / Meghan Babcock vs Jennifer Matheson / Sherry Ray7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLauren Kauffman vs Mais Ashkar6-4, 6-2
2025-07-02vs EM GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesKadie Desoe / Lauren Kauffman vs Amy Dodge / Kristen Mancherian5-7, 3-6
2025-06-25vs HG REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKadie Desoe / Wendy Titus vs Erica Palmer / Jodi Roberts3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBethany Cook / Julie Foreman vs Sarah Knudtson / AMANDA MILLER1-6, 6-7
2025-06-18vs LTFC PINKWon 20
W#1 SinglesLauren Kauffman vs Lisa Heichel6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMeghan Babcock / Kadie Desoe vs Andrea Starlin / Julie Thorn2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-17vs CCV GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesKadie Desoe / Wendy Titus vs Nicky Fleming / Melissa Mitarotonda6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLauren Kauffman vs Rebecca Aronoff6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Foreman / Bethany Cook vs Manuela Seewald / Lindsay Wingate1-6, 1-6
2025-06-11vs WC NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesKadie Desoe / Lauren Baker vs Stephanie Block / Emily Goers4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesWendy Titus vs Andrea Gee3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMeghan Babcock / Lauren Kauffman vs Jessica Crandall Snyder / Sarah Cheng7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings90 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MC RED7017410125
2EM TEAL7017410128
3EM NAVY7017412151
4KC-CC TEAL7016512135
5CHCC NAVY7016513121
6CPCC YELLOW7014719172
7CACM RED611839121
8DTC ORANGE6117411119
9HW YELLOW6115613143
10CM BLUE6116515143
11DTP YELLOW6116515144
12KC-RH NAVY6114716156
13WC NAVY5114411132
14EM GREEN5113514143
15VC TEAL5216512137
16WC GREEN5215614146
17BCST BLUE5215616150
18VCC GREEN5213816156
19RCC GREEN5214718165
20WP YELLOW5213818152
21SS-H YELLOW5212920181
22BRMST TEAL5212920161
23NJ GREEN5213821182
24VC BLUE52111021194
25NJ PURPLE5212922195
26VCC RED4281022171
27SS-LT NAVY4314714149
28CCV RED4314717145
29HV GREEN4312918157
30BCST RED4312918146
31HF YELLOW4312919163
32CM GREEN4313820149
33MEA GREEN4312920184
34SS-D PURPLE4312920168
35HV ORANGE43111020159
36RMTC TEAL4312920169
37DTC RED4312921184
38BM RED4312921190
39GCC BLUE43111021175
40WP-C ORANGE43111021157
41RCC BLUE43111022154
42CVTA TEAL43111022170
43CCC PINK43111022169
44GAC RED43101123205
45PH GREEN43101123159
46RRTC NAVY43101124173
47RHCC BLUE4391225184
48SS-LGT RED43111026207
49LTFC PINK3381021162
50BRMST NAVY34111020167
51RHCC RED3412920156
52CCV BLUE34111021156
53GCC RED34111023171
54WP-G GREEN34111024198
55CCC ORANGE3491225173
56KC-RH BLUE34101126191
57GTC BLUE3491227201
58BM GREEN3491228216
59WP-O BLUE3481328195
60BM PURPLE34101128214
61GR RED3481329207
62HW GREEN3461533215
63SS-LT GREEN2410819154
64HG RED2471124174
65HFII RED2591225193
66MVCC GREEN2591226206
67FOX RED2591227192
68LEBTC RED2591227200
69HG GREEN2571430203
70FOX BLUE2571430221
71HV PURPLE2571430209
72SS-LT YELLOW2571431225
73CVTA PURPLE2551634229
74GPTC SILVER2561534225
75KC-CC RED1681327198
76PTC RED1671428202
77SKY RED1661530217
78SKY BLUE1661530214
79CPV BLUE1681330207
80BP ORANGE1661530211
81SS-H TEAL1661532226
82LTC-D TEAL1661532221
83HRCA-S TEAL1651633218
84GR BLUE1651634219
85WP-G NAVY1621938243
86CCV GREEN0631530197
87GR YELLOW0731836227
88EM RED0721938232
89WP-O NAVY0721939240
90EM BLUE0712040246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.48
Kadie Desoe
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.48
Lauren Kauffman
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.33
Julie Foreman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Bethany Cook
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.16
Wendy Titus
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.95
Meghan Babcock
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Foreman + Kadie Desoe213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kadie Desoe
19W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
3
Lauren Kauffman
40W–38L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Julie Foreman
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Bethany Cook
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Titus
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Meghan Babcock
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.