Teams

MATA/Gerald Granstaff

2023 MATA Tri-Level 55 & Over - Spring · 3.0

9 players · average NTRP / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
James C Barlow
published
3.50
Frank Jones
published
3.48
Mickey Wright
published
3.44
Jonathan Shepherd
published
3.23
Kelvin Oliver
published
3.19
Rudy Lamothe
published
3.14
Scott Hastings
published
3.06
Philip West
published
Eddie Skoda
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

James C Barlow
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
3.67
Frank Jones
17W–26L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
Mickey Wright
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
Jonathan Shepherd
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
Kelvin Oliver
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Rudy Lamothe
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Scott Hastings
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
Philip West
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Eddie Skoda
14W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.