Teams

Battlefield Ball Busters-Ford

2024 Fredericksburg Tri-Level 18 & Over · Fredericksburg Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesLori Huthoefer / Kathryn Davis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-18vs TRI Level-CaliriWon 20
W#2 DoublesLori Huthoefer / Kathryn Davis vs Melissa Hutcheson / Rachael Day6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSue Nilsson / Dalyah Ronzio vs Megan Roberge / Judith Jobrack7-6, 6-4
2024-08-11vs FCC Tie Breakers-BlakemoreLost 01
L#2 DoublesDebbie Kem / Mary Jane Wooldridge vs Liz Walsh / Kristina Pallen3-6, 6-7
2024-08-10vs TRI Level-CaliriWon 20
W#2 DoublesLori Huthoefer / Cynthia Robinson vs Marla Aste / Leslie Caliri1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSue Nilsson / Dalyah Ronzio vs Nicole Fassnacht / Judith Jobrack7-5, 6-3
2024-08-01vs FCC Tie Breakers-BlakemoreWon 10
W#2 DoublesDebbie Kem / Cynthia Robinson vs Dorota Sipko / Kristina Pallen6-1, 6-1
2024-07-11vs FCC Tie Breakers-BlakemoreSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDebbie Kem / Kathryn Davis vs Liz Walsh / Kristina Pallen6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Button / Sue Nilsson vs Rachel Wadkins / Jamie Mcneill6-4, 7-5
2024-07-07vs TRI Level-CaliriWon 10
W#3 DoublesSue Nilsson / Dalyah Ronzio vs Nicole Fassnacht / Megan Roberge6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Lori Huthoefer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Debbie Kem
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Jacalyn Bennett
published 3.5
3.06
Cynthia Robinson
published 3.5
2.92
Dalyah Ronzio
published 3
2.85
Susan Button
published
2.81
Tara Ford
published
2.81
Sue Nilsson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
June Brick
published
Kathryn Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Huthoefer + Debbie Kem8551% gamesnot enough data
Jacalyn Bennett + Debbie Kem123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lori Huthoefer
264W–187L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Debbie Kem
233W–165L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Jacalyn Bennett
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cynthia Robinson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Dalyah Ronzio
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
Susan Button
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
Tara Ford
20W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Sue Nilsson
85W–147L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
June Brick
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathryn Davis
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Jane Wooldridge
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.