Teams

Salgado (Royal Palm)

2024 MIAMIDADE Adult 55 & Over - Spring · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-18vs Caamano (Salvadore Park)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAna Etzold / Kim Giles vs Nicole Kasten / Beatriz Morales6-1, 6-3
2024-03-11vs Porter (Deering Bay)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesEunice McCann / Kim Giles vs Raysa Marrero / Karell Campbell4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Zagorski / Liliana Cook vs Marla Ferreira / Audrey Martinez6-7, 4-6
2024-03-04vs Quinton (Miami Shores)Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrenda Salgado / Ana Etzold vs Gail Zvijac / Lucy Hassan4-2
2024-02-26vs Miami/TeamRiviera/55&over7.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesAna Etzold / Kim Giles vs Tracie Williams / Donna Kass6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRobin Zagorski / Brenda Salgado vs Leticia Diaz / Jayne Irvin Hopps3-6, 4-6
2024-02-19vs Quinton (Miami Shores)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAna Etzold / Kim Giles vs Susan Budenz / Paula Barth6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrenda Salgado / Rosy Bild vs Gail Zvijac / Lucy Hassan6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Feldman / Eunice McCann vs Jennifer Quinton / Stacey Wald3-6, 4-6
2024-01-29vs Porter (Deering Bay)Split 11
L#1 DoublesISABEL RICO PASTOR / Robin Zagorski vs Karell Campbell / Raysa Marrero0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrenda Salgado / Monika Martins vs Marla Ferreira / Audrey Martinez2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-01-15vs Miami/TeamRiviera/55&over7.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAna Etzold / Brenda Salgado vs Tracie Williams / Donna Kass3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMonika Martins / Kim Giles vs Maggie Sanchez / Gillian McKenzie6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Kim Giles
published
3.34
Eunice McCann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Brenda Salgado
published 3.5
3.26
Liliana Cook
published
3.25
Nancy Feldman
published
3.24
ISABEL RICO PASTOR
published
3.24
Monika Martins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Ana Etzold
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Angelica Abud
published 3.5
3.15
Rosy Bild
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Robin Zagorski
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Jeanne Spital
published
Tere Aloma
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Giles + Brenda Salgado7159% games+7.4% vs expected
Ana Etzold + Eunice McCann11458% games−7.7% vs expected
Monika Martins + Rosy Bild4748% gamesnot enough data
Rosy Bild + Robin Zagorski4447% gamesnot enough data
Rosy Bild + Eunice McCann5260% gamesnot enough data
Monika Martins + Ana Etzold3250% gamesnot enough data
Eunice McCann + Nancy Feldman2334% gamesnot enough data
Monika Martins + Eunice McCann314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Giles
21W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
Eunice McCann
178W–120L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Brenda Salgado
25W–16L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
Liliana Cook
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Nancy Feldman
10W–17L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
ISABEL RICO PASTOR
19W–29L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Monika Martins
54W–67L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Ana Etzold
166W–121L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Angelica Abud
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Rosy Bild
90W–91L career · 1 line in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
Robin Zagorski
34W–55L career · 3 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Jeanne Spital
1W–18L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
2.88
Tere Aloma
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.