Teams

Long/Nashville

2026 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Men - Sunday Daytime

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-10vs Horn/NashvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesKurt Guske / Daniel Tan vs David Eagan / Connor Horn2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGregg Bolton vs Ryan Moss0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Knezha / Roger Smith vs Nicholas Cook / Michael Garde0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Mann / Shalin Shah vs Louis Alessi / Paul Lochmiller2-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesPhil Carr / David Taylor vs Michael Drescher / Mark Hirst3-6, 2-6
2026-05-03vs Horn/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesRoger Smith / Daniel Tan vs Nicholas Cook / Paul Lochmiller2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDavid Long vs Michael Patterson6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPhil Carr / John Mann vs Jerry Sims / Theo Smith0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesGabriel Harr / Daniel Knezha vs Ryan Moss / Wade Shrivalle0-6, 0-6
W#4 DoublesKurt Guske / David Taylor vs Louis Alessi / Connor Horn7-6, 6-3
2026-04-26vs Horn/NashvilleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDaniel Tan / David Taylor vs Michael Drescher / Mark Hirst6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesDavid Long vs Jerry Sims6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Mann / Roger Smith vs Louis Alessi / Andrew Stankiewicz3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPhil Carr / Sameer Saxena vs David Eagan / Wade Shrivalle1-6, 1-6
2026-04-19vs Horn/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesGregg Bolton / David Long vs Nicholas Cook / Theo Smith6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPhil Carr vs Jerry Sims2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Knezha / Daniel Tan vs Michael Garde / Sunil Krishnan3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Mann / Roger Smith vs Connor Horn / Andrew Stankiewicz6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesShalin Shah / Barry Shrum vs Michael Drescher / Mark Hirst1-6, 0-6
2026-04-12vs Horn/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesDaniel Knezha / Barry Shrum vs Nicholas Cook / Theo Smith0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesGabriel Harr vs Jerry Sims1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKurt Guske / Daniel Tan vs Michael Drescher / Michael Patterson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPhil Carr / Sameer Saxena vs David Eagan / Paul Lochmiller1-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesDavid Long / Roger Smith vs Michael Garde / Sunil Krishnan1-6, 0-6
2026-03-29vs Horn/NashvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesKurt Guske / Daniel Tan vs Connor Horn / Theo Smith3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDavid Long vs Ryan Moss3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Mann / Roger Smith vs Nicholas Cook / Paul Lochmiller2-3
L#3 DoublesPhil Carr / Barry Shrum vs Michael Patterson / Ben Sanford4-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesGabriel Harr / Daniel Knezha vs Louis Alessi / Andrew Stankiewicz2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men - Sunday Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Shalin Shah
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
David Long
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.90
Daniel Tan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Roger Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 17% · published
2.79
Gregg Bolton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.71
Kurt Guske
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
Barry Shrum
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
John Mann
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.60
Sameer Saxena
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Daniel Knezha
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.35
Gabriel Harr
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.33
Phil Carr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Mann + Phil Carr044 matchesnot enough data
Kurt Guske + Daniel Tan123 matchesnot enough data
Roger Smith + John Mann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shalin Shah
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
David Long
11W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Daniel Tan
12W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
Roger Smith
10W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Gregg Bolton
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Kurt Guske
10W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Barry Shrum
0W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
John Mann
2W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.61
Sameer Saxena
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Daniel Knezha
2W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Gabriel Harr
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.35
Phil Carr
0W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.