Teams

Keyes, Angie

2025 Combo 55 & Over-JXN · Women 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-10-13vs Trigg, AnitaLost 03
L#1 DoublesLulu Pyron / Virginia Vanlandingham vs Kaye Donald / Iona Remulta0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Penna / Kathie Hall vs Joycelynn Cooper / Jeannie Kellicut0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Hughes / Carolyn Whyte vs Angela Yeatts / Tina Harris3-6, 1-6
2025-10-05vs Mitchell, ReJohnnaLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Penna / Carolyn Whyte vs Bertha Brookins / Jeana Swan3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesVirginia Vanlandingham / Monica Day vs Jacqueline Andrews / Tonia McKenzie2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAngie Keyes / Mary Kennedy vs ReJohnna Mitchell / Roberlyn Searcy3-6, 4-6
2025-09-28vs Santangelo, FayeLost 12
L#1 DoublesCynthia Rhaly / Lulu Pyron vs Zandra Nowell / Kelly Crockett2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMary Kennedy / Susan Farris vs Phyllis Keveryn / Rhonda Shannon6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKathie Hall / Karen Penna vs Nan Dear / Celia Manley3-6, 3-6
2025-09-21vs Bryant, DebbieLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngie Keyes / Leslie Carpenter vs Jeanna Tanner / Jonna Farr2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Rhaly / Carolyn Whyte vs Debbie Bryant / Lynnice Limbaugh2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnna Hughes / Kathie Hall vs Teri Norton / Paula Boulanger6-4, 6-4
2025-09-13vs Davis, LindaLost 03
L#1 DoublesCynthia Rhaly / Kathie Hall vs Robbyn Johnson / Kathryn McDaniel3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary Kennedy / Virginia Vanlandingham vs Jennifer Lefoldt / Debra Christie6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnna Hughes / Carolyn Whyte vs Muriel Greer / Debra Baker0-6, 3-6
2025-09-07vs Trigg, AnitaLost 03
L#1 DoublesLulu Pyron / Cynthia Rhaly vs Deborah McGehee / Tina Harris1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie McLeod / Kathie Hall vs Jennie Mullen / Meg Maulding5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Penna / Monica Day vs Bridget Carmody / Angela Yeatts1-6, 1-6
2025-08-24vs Mitchell, ReJohnnaLost 02
L#2 DoublesLeslie Carpenter / Susan Farris vs ReJohnna Mitchell / Roberlyn Searcy4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAngie Keyes / Monica Day vs Bertha Brookins / Jeana Swan0-6, 1-2
2025-08-17vs Santangelo, FayeLost 03
L#1 DoublesVirginia Vanlandingham / Cherri Buckley vs Phyllis Keveryn / Rhonda Shannon4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Farris / Kathie Hall vs Tina Roberts / Kelly Crockett5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLulu Pyron / Leslie Carpenter vs Nan Dear / Celia Manley3-6, 6-7
2025-08-10vs Bryant, DebbieLost 03
L#1 DoublesCherri Buckley / Karen Penna vs Debbie Bryant / Teri Norton2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Carpenter / Virginia Vanlandingham vs Jeanna Tanner / Jonna Farr1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Hughes / Lulu Pyron vs Amy Kirby / Lynnice Limbaugh5-7, 1-6
2025-08-03vs Davis, LindaWon 21
L#1 DoublesLulu Pyron / Susan Farris vs Jennifer Lefoldt / Debra Christie6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAngie Keyes / Kathie Hall vs Polly Moon / Debra Baker6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Kennedy / Virginia Vanlandingham vs Linda Blissett / Kathryn McDaniel6-0, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cynthia Rhaly
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Angie Keyes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Susan Farris
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Cherri Buckley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Leslie Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.46
Carolyn Whyte
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Karen Penna
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Kathie Hall
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Lulu Pyron
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Melanie McLeod
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Monica Day
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Virginia Vanlandingham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Farris + Angie Keyes3545% games+0.6% vs expected
Karen Penna + Susan Farris033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cynthia Rhaly
7W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Angie Keyes
17W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Susan Farris
8W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.88
3
Cherri Buckley
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Carpenter
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Carolyn Whyte
28W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Karen Penna
0W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathie Hall
6W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lulu Pyron
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melanie McLeod
41W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Monica Day
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Virginia Vanlandingham
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.