Teams

Akcam

2022 Coppermine Adult 40 & Over · Coppermine Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-06-16vs BelloneLost 01
L#1 DoublesManeesha Ahluwalia / Deidra Crews vs Julie Snavely / Patricia Mutascio1-6, 6-7
2022-06-09vs BelloneWon 10
W#3 DoublesDeidra Crews / Beyza Akcam vs Ashling Pollard / Donna Slaughter6-3, 6-0
2022-06-01vs BelloneLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeyza Akcam / Nancy Der vs Mina Horn / Kate Powell4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-05-31vs BakerWon 10
W#3 DoublesBeyza Akcam / Alicia Ault vs Angela Class / Patricia Stavros2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesSue Burdette / Beyza Akcam vs Stacey Hardin / Nancy Ekelund6-1, 6-1
2022-05-20vs BakerWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeyza Akcam / Jessica Walsh vs Pamela Baker / Christine Ioannou3-2
2022-05-17vs BelloneWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeyza Akcam / Nancy Der vs Joan Royals / Patricia Mutascio7-6, 6-1
2022-05-15Won 10
W#1 SinglesBeyza Akcam vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-07vs BakerLost 01
L#3 DoublesBeyza Akcam / Susan Rhee vs Carolyn Norris / Lesley Tompkins2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-30Lost 01
L#1 SinglesManeesha Ahluwalia vs Jennifer Lee5-7, 1-6
2022-04-08vs BakerLost 01
L#3 DoublesBeyza Akcam / Merve Gurlu vs Pamela Baker / Patricia Stavros4-6, 2-6
2022-04-02vs Team NelsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesBeyza Akcam / Audrey Liu vs Tina Holmes / Janis Schlerf2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Coppermine Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Eboni Lance
published 4.5
3.53
Maneesha Ahluwalia
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Rebecca Stewart
published
3.37
Beyza Akcam
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.31
Tracy Flaherty
published
3.24
Diane Carson
published 3.5
Nancy Der
published
Sue Burdette
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eboni Lance + Maneesha Ahluwalia4354% gamesnot enough data
Maneesha Ahluwalia + Beyza Akcam314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eboni Lance
357W–214L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
4.38
4
Maneesha Ahluwalia
121W–124L career · 2 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
Rebecca Stewart
36W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
4
Beyza Akcam
211W–250L career · 10 lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
3.37
Tracy Flaherty
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Diane Carson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Nancy Der
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sue Burdette
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.