Teams

McAllister (Ron Ehmann)

2022 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Spring - Night · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-05vs Sengupta (Crandon Park)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesEdward Hasegawa / ROGER VALECILLOS vs Francisco Cruz / Robert Flowers3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMario Montero / Geoffrey Meurrens vs Andre Sophia / Fernando Ferreyros1-6, 1-6
2022-03-08vs Miami-Dade/GuevaraSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEdward Hasegawa / ROGER VALECILLOS vs Alejandro Gonzalez / Omar Antonio Crespo Nieves6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKen Cheng / Geoffrey Meurrens vs Julio Jimenez / JAIME KANG3-6, 6-7
2022-03-01vs Moore (Coral Pine)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesOSCAR QUINONEZ / Geoffrey Meurrens vs Felipe de Los Rios / Thomas Kunz6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesROGER VALECILLOS / Edward Hasegawa vs Manuel Mejia / Douglas Inciarte5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2022-02-15vs Rodriguez (Alper JCC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesGeoffrey Meurrens / Guillermo Inostroza vs Christian Walker / Jesus Larranaga1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesFrank Cipriani / Edward Hasegawa vs Frank Leighton / Glenn Davis6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-02-08vs Kulcsar (Crandon Park)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesEdward Hasegawa / ROGER VALECILLOS vs Michel Kulcsar / Jorge Rodriguez4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesGeoffrey Meurrens vs Diego Caceres0-6, 1-6
2022-01-25vs Tennis Addicts (Tamiami Park)Won 10
W#2 DoublesGeoffrey Meurrens / Guillermo Inostroza vs Jose A Viloria / Ricardo Alvarez4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-01-18Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGeoffrey Meurrens / Guillermo Inostroza vs JOSE BELTRAN / Carlos Lopez3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Ken Cheng
published
3.73
Edward Hasegawa
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
Jose Dumar
published
3.67
Mario Montero
published
3.66
Giovanni Maneri
published 4
3.65
ROGER VALECILLOS
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.57
Geoffrey Meurrens
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edward Hasegawa + ROGER VALECILLOS21956% games+2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken Cheng
14W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
4.29
4
Edward Hasegawa
72W–74L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Jose Dumar
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Mario Montero
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Giovanni Maneri
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.66
4
ROGER VALECILLOS
106W–124L career · 15 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Geoffrey Meurrens
62W–98L career · 7 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.