Teams

PRC - Bertovic

2026 B'ham Combo - 18 & Over - Weeknight · 7.5 Women - Tuesday Evening

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-18vs Hoover Met - McKnightLost 03
L#1 DoublesEvans Foster / Amanda Hardaway vs Roberta Leach / Megan Hartin6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLindsey Fehr / Katy Murphy vs Margaret Sgarlata / Tammy McClure2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHeidi Goodman / Anne McCarley vs Carson Ryan / Kaitlyn Mohlenbrok2-6, 4-6
2026-08-04vs Hoover Met - Nace/ BirdLost 12
W#1 DoublesHeidi Goodman / Anna Beth Goodman vs Maloree McDonough / Shannon Rodgers7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMeg Brown / Bethany Bertovic vs Meredith Plains / Alyssa Bird1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobyn Lyons / Anna Hart vs Paige Whitt / Wendy Nace1-6, 3-6
2026-07-30vs Gardendale - AdamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Hardaway / Meg Brown vs Julie Jolley / Mary Michael Key6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Goodman / Courtney Taylor vs Shannon Fletcher / Renita Rhone4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBethany Bertovic / Anna Hart vs Marie Zassoda / Joni Holt6-4, 6-3
2026-07-28vs PRC - Kirkland/Segrest 7.5 ComboLost 03
L#1 DoublesLindsey Fehr / Heidi Goodman vs Liana Byrd / Lana Shoultz2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMeg Brown / Meghan Griffith vs Debbie Drake / Kristin Wallace4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEvans Foster / Anne McCarley vs Elizabeth Daly / Stephanie Kirkland7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-07-14vs Hoover Met - Robbins/VaughnLost 03
L#1 DoublesEvans Foster / Amanda Hardaway vs Nital Patel / Jennet Jumayeva1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBritt Puckett / Lindsey Fehr vs Amber Vaughn / Kim Douglas2-5
L#3 DoublesMeghan Griffith / Courtney Taylor vs Elizabeth Pugh / Laura Dreer4-6, 1-6
2026-07-07vs Vestavia CC - Freeman/BoydWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeidi Goodman / Courtney Taylor vs Mindi Perlis / Kimberly Downey2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLindsey Fehr / Katy Murphy vs Kendra Weaver / Laura Lee Charles4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBethany Bertovic / Anne McCarley vs Chrissy Aubin / Breanna Young6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.5 Women - Tuesday Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hoover Met - Nace/ Bird4111412118
2PRC - Bertovic2351022160
3Gardendale - Adams2461227172
4PRC - Kirkland/Segrest 7.5 Combo147818146

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Amanda Hardaway
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Heidi Goodman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.41
Bethany Bertovic
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Anna Beth Goodman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Anne McCarley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Britt Puckett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Courtney Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.22
Evans Foster
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Katy Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.19
Anna Hart
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Meg Brown
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Meghan Griffith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Robyn Lyons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.93
Lindsey Fehr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Lyons + Bethany Bertovic7261% games+13.0% vs expected
Britt Puckett + Anne McCarley5166% games+12.1% vs expected
Amanda Hardaway + Bethany Bertovic7260% games+5.3% vs expected
Heidi Goodman + Robyn Lyons5356% games+3.2% vs expected
Robyn Lyons + Anna Hart3841% games−0.8% vs expected
Courtney Taylor + Robyn Lyons3349% games−5.2% vs expected
Courtney Taylor + Heidi Goodman3345% gamesnot enough data
Amanda Hardaway + Robyn Lyons4156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Hardaway
28W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Heidi Goodman
64W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Bethany Bertovic
55W–32L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Anna Beth Goodman
2W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Anne McCarley
32W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Britt Puckett
29W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Courtney Taylor
44W–37L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Evans Foster
20W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
Katy Murphy
34W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.22
3.5
Anna Hart
42W–61L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Meg Brown
28W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
Meghan Griffith
5W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
Robyn Lyons
80W–95L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Lindsey Fehr
21W–17L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.