Teams

LVTA NAVY

2026 TRIO - NOCO · MEN 3.5 - TRIO - NOCO

4 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-25vs FCCC WHITEWon 20
W#1 DoublesJason Boxerman / Brian Hamill vs Neal McConnellogue / Frankie Cerrone2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDave Trammell vs WILLIAM BIGGS3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-18vs LT GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJason Boxerman / Thiago Pacheco Garcia vs Christopher Jones / Craig Seager6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrian Hamill / Dave Trammell vs Jeffrey Ehrlich / Ronald McKenzie1-6, 1-6
2026-04-11vs HMTC BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesJason Boxerman / Thiago Pacheco Garcia vs Steve Weber / Benjamin Cole6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrian Hamill / Dave Trammell vs Joe Whitlock / Peter Landry0-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-04-04vs MLF BLACKLost 02
L#1 DoublesJason Boxerman / Dave Trammell vs Kendell Buxton / Robert Sullivan1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Hamill / Thiago Pacheco Garcia vs Thomas Kampe / Patrick Murphy6-7, 4-6
2026-03-28vs LT MAROONLost 02
L#1 DoublesJason Boxerman / Dave Trammell vs HUTTON EWERT / Noman Ghiasy2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Hamill / Thiago Pacheco Garcia vs Andrew Dillon / Daniel Veloso Aguila2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · MEN 3.5 - TRIO - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LT MAROON50150190
2LT GREEN328717134
3FCCC WHITE237817118
4MLF BLACK237818146
5HMTC BLUE2341123145
6LVTA NAVY1441124162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Thiago Pacheco Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Jason Boxerman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Brian Hamill
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.81
Dave Trammell
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Hamill + Dave Trammell4742% games+5.9% vs expected
Jason Boxerman + Dave Trammell0529% games−11.4% vs expected
Brian Hamill + Jason Boxerman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Thiago Pacheco Garcia
13W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Jason Boxerman
24W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Brian Hamill
20W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Dave Trammell
17W–80L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.